Intracellular free heme concentration detection versus high-risk human papillomavirus detection in screening cervical cancer and precancerous lesions
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2021.06.009
- VernacularTitle:细胞游离亚铁原卟啉检测与高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测对宫颈癌及癌前病变的筛查价值比较
- Author:
Jin CHENG
1
;
Ping ZHOU
;
Mingwei LI
;
Quan WU
Author Information
1. 安徽省，淮南市第一人民医院妇产科 232007
- Keywords:
Uterine cervical neoplasms;
Precancerous conditions;
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia;
Protoporphyrins;
Human papillomavirus;
DNA tests;
Cytological techn
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2021;28(6):839-843
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the application value of intracellular free heme concentration (FH) detection and high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) detection in screening cervical cancer and precancerous lesions.Methods:A total of 238 patients with cervical abnormalities who received FH and HPV detection in Huainan First People's Hospital, China from October 2017 to October 2019 were included in this study. Taking liquid-based ThinPrep cytologic test (TCT) results and pathological biopsy results as gold standard, the diagnostic value of FH detection and TCT detection for cervical cancer and precancerous lesions were compared.Results:TCT results revealed normal/inflammatory diagnosis in 97 patients, and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or higher grade diagnosis in 141 patients. Pathological biopsy results reported cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade II or above in 70 out of the 141 patients. The detection rate of FH detection for CIN grade II or above cervical lesions was 92.86% (65/70) and the detection rate of high-risk HPV detection was 95.71% (67/70). The sensitivity and specificity of FH detection in the screening CIN grade II or above cervical lesions were 82.86% (58/70) and 85.92% (60/70), respectively and they were 94.29% (66/70) and 98.59% (69/70) for high-risk HPV detection. There were significant differences in diagnostic sensitivity and specificity between FH dection and high-risk HPV detection ( χ2 = 4.52, 10.25, both P < 0.05). Conclusion:High-risk HPV detection is of high application value in the diagnosis of cervical cancer and precancerous lesions. It has higher sensitivty and specificity in screening cervical cancer and precancerous lesions than FH detection. But FH detection is simpler, more economical and easier to use and is more suitable for large-scale screening of cervical cancer and precancerous lesions than high-risk HPV detection.
