The influence of nursing model based on mind map on the psychological status and prognosis of patients undergoing thoracoscopic laparoscopic esophageal cancer resection
10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20200925-04006
- VernacularTitle:依托思维导图的护理模式对胸腹腔镜食管癌切除术患者心理状况及预后的影响
- Author:
Haili LIANG
1
;
Di LIN
;
Peng LIU
Author Information
1. 海南省三亚市人民医院心胸外科 572000
- Keywords:
Esophageal neoplasms;
Mind map;
Psychological condition;
Malignant tumor;
Coping style
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2021;37(29):2296-2301
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the influence of mind map based nursing mode on psychological status and prognosis of patients undergoing thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy.Methods:A total of 116 patients who underwent thoracoscopic laparoscopic esophageal cancer resection in Sanya People′s Hospital, Hainan Province from November 2017 to October 2019 were selected. According to the admission time, all patients were divided into control group and observation group, with 58 cases in each group. The patients in the control group used conventional nursing strategies, and the observation group used the method of relying on mind mapping on the basis of conventional strategies to assist nursing intervention. The negative emotions and coping styles of the two groups at admission and discharge, as well as the ICU re-occupancy rate, unplanned extubation rate, and satisfaction with nursing intervention between the two groups were compared.Results:At admission, there was no significant difference in Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-rating Depression Scale(SDS) scores between the two groups ( P>0.05). At discharge, the SAS and SDS scores of the observation group were 38.99±5.07 and 37.25±5.59, 43.25±6.49 and 41.26±4.54. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant ( t values were 3.939, 4.241, all P<0.01). At admission, there was no statistically significant difference in the scores of facing, yielding, and avoiding between the two groups ( P>0.05). At discharge, the scores of face, yield, and avoidance of the observation group were 15.47±1.86, 8.92±1.16, 9.05±1.18, and the control group were 13.32±1.60, 11.11±1.56, 12.03±1.56, the differences between the two groups were statistically significant ( t values were -6.674, 8.579, 11.603, all P<0.01). The ICU re-occupancy rate and unplanned extubation rate were 1.72% (1/58) and 3.45% (2/58) in the observation group, and 13.79% (8/58) and 15.52% (9/58) in the control group, the differences were statistically significant ( χ2 values were 4.336, 4.921, all P<0.05). The observation group ′s satisfaction with nursing intervention, communication ability, professional knowledge, and disease mastery scores were 6.81±1.95, 7.02±2.01, 8.12±1.23, and the control group were 5.35±2.11, 5.71±1.87, 6.21±0.99, the differences were statistically significant ( t values were -3.870, -3.634, -9.213, all P<0.001). Conclusions:For patients undergoing thoracic laparoscopic esophageal cancer resection, the use of mind-mapping-based nursing intervention is beneficial to improve the patient ′s psychological condition, prognosis and nursing satisfaction.
