Impact of motivational interviewing combined with feedback teaching on the active cycle of breathing technique training among lung cancer patients
10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20200703-03015
- VernacularTitle:动机性访谈联合回馈教学对肺癌患者主动呼吸循环技术训练的干预效果研究
- Author:
Jiudi ZHONG
1
;
Chuanzhen LI
;
Ziya XIN
;
Yuxia HUANG
;
Li LIU
Author Information
1. 中山大学肿瘤防治中心胸科，广州 510060
- Keywords:
Health education;
Motivational interviewing;
Feedback teaching;
Lung neoplasms;
Active cycle of breathing technique
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2021;37(22):1688-1694
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the effect of motivational interview combined with feedback teaching on active cycle of breathing technique(ACBT) training in lung cancer patients.Methods:A total of 632 patients with lung cancer undergoing radical resection from September 2017 to March 2019 in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were selected and divided into the experimental group and the control group with 316 cases in each group by operation time. The experimental group received motivational interview combined with feedback teaching education, while the control group received routine education. The patients were followed up for 2 months. The compliance and accuracy of ACBT training, self-care ability, sputum discharge and incidence of pulmonary complications were compared between the two groups.Results:The sputum volume in the control group was (6.25±2.44), (9.28±2.63), (10.33±3.15) g in the control group and (8.74±4.17),(13.87±3.19),(14.18±4.16) g in the experimental group at 1, 2, 3 days after operation, and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant ( t values were -1.149, -2.316, -4.124, P<0.01 or 0.05). There were 56 cases(17.72%) of pulmonary complications in the control group and 33 cases (10.44%) in the experimental group. The difference in the incidence of pulmonary complications between the two groups was statistically significant ( χ2 value was 4.743, P<0.01).Two months after operation, the compliance and accuracy of ACBT training in the experimental group were better than those in the control group ( χ2 values were - 4.57, - 2.15, P<0.01).The improvement in the four dimensions after intervention in the experimental group were better than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant ( t values were 8.314-19.719, P<0.01). Conclusions:The motivational interview combined with feedback teaching is an effective method of health education, which is conducive to improving lung cancer patients' compliance and accuracy of postoperative ACBT training, improving patients' self-care ability, promoting the discharge of patients' sputum and reducing the incidence of pulmonary complications to promote the recovery of lung function.
