Application of shared decision making-based intervention in stable coronary artery disease patients with decisional conflict
10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20200911-03855
- VernacularTitle:共享决策干预方案在稳定性冠心病决策困境患者中的应用研究
- Author:
Jia CHEN
1
;
Xiufang QIN
;
Chunyan MA
;
Qian WANG
Author Information
1. 上海中医药大学附属曙光医院急诊科 201203
- Keywords:
Shared decision making;
Stable coronary artery disease;
Decisional conflict;
Health literacy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2021;37(17):1314-1321
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Object:To explore the effects of shared decision making-based intervention on decisional conflict and health literacy in stable coronary artery disease patients.Methods:A total of 86 stable coronary artery disease patients were divided into experimental group and control group according to the admission order, with 43 cases in each group. The patients in the control group recieved routine nursing, basis on this, the experimental group carried out shared decision making program. Before and after 1 month of intervention, the effects was assessed by Decisional conflict scale (DCS) and Health literacy management scale (HeLMS), respectively.Results:Before intervention, there was no significant difference in DCS and HeLMS scores between two group( P>0.05). After intervention, the information & values, decision uncertainty and total DCS scores were (6.95±2.13) pionts, (3.44±1.18) pionts and (20.95±3.99) pionts, significantly lower than in the control group (8.77±2.33) pionts, (4.95±1.46) pionts, (25.56±4.03) pionts; the information acquisition ability, interaction ability, willingness to improve health, willingness of financial support and total HeLMS scores were (36.77±4.85) pionts, (35.74±4.58) pionts, (15.07±1.55) pionts, (6.53±1.76) pionts, (94.12±6.44) pionts, significantly higher than in the control group [(34.37±5.84) pionts, (33.19±5.90) pionts, (14.23±1.43) pionts, (5.81±1.29) pionts, (87.60±9.18) pionts], the difference was statistically significant ( t values were 2.070-5.321, P<0.05). Conclusion:Shared decision making can effectively alleviate decisional conflict and improve health literacy of patients with stable coronary artery disease.
