Clinical effect of remote injection device assisted percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
10.3760/cma.j.issn115396-20201130-00375
- VernacularTitle:遥控注射推进装置辅助经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折的临床疗效探讨
- Author:
Wen YANG
1
;
Chuang WANG
;
Yuliang LIU
;
Guohua SONG
;
Heqing LIU
;
Shandi ZHANG
Author Information
1. 菏泽市立医院脊柱外科 274031
- Keywords:
Vertebroplasty;
Osteoporosis;
Treatment outcome;
Vertebral compression fracture;
Bone cement leakage
- From:
International Journal of Surgery
2021;48(8):542-547
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the clinical effect of remote injection device assisted percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.Methods:Using retrospective research and analysis methods, 168 patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures admitted to Heze Municipal Hospital from September 2019 to August 2020 were selected. A total of 139 cases were followed up, with a follow-up rate of 82.7%, including 22 males and 117 females, with an average age of 74.17 years. According to the different equipment used, they were divided into two groups. Seventy-two cases used remote injection device to assist percutaneous vertebroplasty (observation group), 67 cases used traditional puncture needle puncture percutaneous vertebroplasty (control group). All patients were completed follow-up at 3 months after surgery. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, bone cement injection volume, bone cement leakage rate, VAS score and ODI score of 1 day, 1 month and 3 months after operation were observed. Measurement data were expressed as ( Mean± SD), using t test, counting data were expressed as percentage [ n(%)], using χ2 test. Results:Both groups of patients successfully completed the operation without complications such as paraplegia, pulmonary embolism, or infection. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in operation time of two groups[(47.71±6.05) min vs (47.61±5.66) min, t=0.100, P=0.920]. The intraoperative blood loss of the two groups was no statistically significant difference [(7.08±3.00) mL vs (8.06±3.48) mL, t=1.782, P=0.079]. The difference between two groups of the amount of bone cement injected was statistically significant, [(6.44±1.03) mL vs (5.73±1.41) mL, t=3.369, P=0.001]. The bone cement leakage rate of the observation group was 27.78% (19/72), and the control group was 43.28% (29/67), and there was statistically significant( χ2=4.382, P=0.036). The preoperative VAS score of the observation group was (6.75±1.14) , and the control group was (6.64±1.08), and there was no significant difference between two groups( t=0.583, P=0.561) The VAS scores of the observation group and the control group were (1.28±0.75) and (1.21±0.77) respectively at 1 day after surgery. There was no statistically significant difference between two groups( t=0.583, P=0.588). The VAS scores of the observation group and the control group were (0.89±0.76) and (1.09±0.67) respectively at 1 month after operation. There was no statistically significant difference between two groups( t=1.641, P=0.103). The VAS scores of the observation group and the control group were (0.74±0.63) and (0.87±0.74) respectively at 3 months after operation. There was no statistically significant difference between two groups( t=1.118, P=0.266). The preoperative ODI scores of the observation group and the control group were (60.32±7.46) and (61.96±9.76) respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between two groups( t=1.121, P=0.264). The ODI scores of the observation group and the control group were (14.93±6.01) and (15.10±6.43) respectively at 1 day after operation, there was no statistically significant difference between two groups( t=0.161, P=0.872). The ODI scores of the observation group and the control group were (10.54±4.24) and (11.31±3.71) respectively at 1 month after operation, and there was no statistically significant difference between two groups( t=1.136, P=0.258). The ODI scores of the observation group and the control group were (10.64±3.70) and (10.39±3.74) respectively at 3 months after operation, and there was no statistically significant difference between two groups( t=0.396, P=0.693). Conclusion:Compared with traditional puncture needle puncture percutaneous vertebroplasty, the remote injection device assisted percutaneous vertebroplasty has a definite clinical effect in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, and the bone cement leakage rate is low.
