Unmet Needs and Services of Rehabilitation for Adults with Disabilities
10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2020.05.001
- VernacularTitle:成年残疾人康复需求与康复服务发展研究
- Author:
Feng-bo LIU
1
;
Ming WU
2
;
Zhuo-ying QIU
3
;
Xin LI
1
;
Lun LI
4
;
Di CHEN
3
;
Jia-ni CHEN
3
;
Zhao-hui SHEN
3
;
Guo-xiang WANG
4
;
Hong-wei SUN
4
;
Jian YANG
2
;
Ruo-fei DU
1
;
Xin-ling LU
1
Author Information
1. China Key Laboratory of Classification, Evaluation and Rehabilitation (Sport) of Intellectual and Development Disability/School of Physical Education (Main Campus), Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China
2. College of Physical Education and Health/Key Laboratory of Adolescent Health Assessment and Exercise Intervention of Ministry of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
3. Research Institute of Rehabilitation Information, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China
4. WHO-FIC Collaborating Center in China, Beijing 100068, China
- Publication Type:Research Article
- Keywords:
adults with disabilities;
unmet needs of rehabilitation;
services of rehabilitation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
2020;26(5):497-501
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the status of disability, characteristics of unmet needs and services of rehabilitation and their related factors for adults with disabilities (AWDs). Methods:A total of 2 315 498 AWDs were sampled from the provincial level administration data (2019). Multiple response analysis was used to analysis the disability status of AWDs, characteristics of unmet needs and received services of rehabilitation, and related factors were explored with Logistic regression. Results:The distribution of disabilities for AWDs from high to low were physical disabilities (62.2%), visual disabilities (9.9%), intellectual disabilities (8.4%), mental disorders (7.3%), hearing disabilities (6.9%), multiple disabilities (2.8%) and speech disabilities (2.5%). The reporting rate of unmet needs of rehabilitation for AWDs from high to low were assistive devices (49.0%), medicine (33.3%), nursing care (27.7%), functional training (20.2%) and surgery (1.9%). The reporting rate of received service for AWDs from high to low were assistive devices (44.1%), nursing care (26.6%), medicine (25.9%), functional training (22.2%) and surgery (1.3%). The logistic regression model shown that types and severities of disabilities had significant effects on unmet needs and received services of rehabilitation for AWDs (P < 0.001). Conclusion:The reporting of unmet needs for AWDs had been influenced by their functioning and disability. There were gaps between unmet needs and received services. It proposed to develop precise and individualized reporting of unmet needs and service programs for AWDs.
