A Case of DiGeorge Syndrome with Metopic Synostosis.
- Author:
Sue Min KIM
1
;
Sun Hee PARK
;
Nak Heon KANG
;
Jun Hee BYEON
Author Information
1. Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea. byeon@catholic.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Case Report
- Keywords:
Metopic synostosis;
DiGeorge syndrome;
22q11.2 microdeletion
- MeSH:
Bone Marrow;
Child;
Cleft Palate;
Comorbidity;
Craniosynostoses;
DiGeorge Syndrome;
Facial Bones;
Fever;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Hydronephrosis;
Infant;
Lymphohistiocytosis, Hemophagocytic;
Orbit;
Pancytopenia;
Parturition;
Physical Examination;
Sutures
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
2011;38(1):77-80
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: We report a patient with DiGeorge syndrome who was later diagnosed as mild metopic synostosis and received anterior 2/3 calvarial remodeling. METHODS: A 16-month-old boy, who underwent palatoplasty for cleft palate at Chungnam National University Hospital when he was 12 months old of age, visited St. Mary's Hospital for known DiGeorge syndrome with craniosynostosis. He had growth retardation and was also diagnosed with hydronephrosis and thymic agenesis. His chromosomal study showed microdeletion of 22q11.2. On physical examination, there were parieto-occipital protrusion and bifrontotemporal narrowing. The facial bone computed tomography showed premature closure of metopic suture, orbital harlequin sign and decreased anterior cranial volume. The interorbital distance was decreased(17mm) and the cephalic index was 93%. RESULTS: After the correction of metopic synostosis by anterior 2/3 calvarial remodeling, the anterior cranial volume expanded with increased interorbital distance and decreased cephalic index. Fever and pancytopenia were noted at 1 month after the operation, and he was diagnosed as hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis by bone marrow study. He however, recovered after pediatric treatment. There was no other complication during the 12 month follow up period. CONCLUSION: This case presents with a rare combination of DiGeorge syndrome and metopic synostosis. When a child is diagnosed with DiGeorge syndrome soon after the birth, clinicians should keep in mind the possibility of an accompanying craniosynostosis. Other possible comorbidities should also be evaluated before the correction of craniosynostosis in patients as DiGeorge syndrome. In addition, postoperative management requires a thorough follow up by a multidisciplinary team of plastic surgeons, neurosurgeons, ophthalmologists and pediatricians.
