Diagnostic analysis of vertical orbital dystopia and canthal tilt for surgical correction
10.5125/jkaoms.2020.46.6.379
- Author:
Ju-Young LEE
1
;
Han-Wool CHOUNG
;
Pill-Hoon CHOUNG
Author Information
1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Publication Type:ORIGINAL ARTICLE
- From:Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
2020;46(6):379-384
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Objectives:We sought to identify a clinically useful method of analyzing orbital dystopia to aid in diagnosis and treatment planning and to quantify vertical discrepancies in eye level and variations in canthal tilt in Koreans.
Patients and Methods:In 76 Korean patients with a mean age of 23.12 years, mean differences in the level of the pupils, lateral canthi, medial canthi, and canthal tilt were measured. The difference in pupil level was calculated from the perpendicular lines drawn from the midpupil area of each eye to the midline of the face to determine the amount of skeletal discrepancy of the eye. Soft tissue discrepancies were determined according to the vertical difference between the lines drawn from the lateral or medial canthus of each eye perpendicular to the midline of the face. The canthal tilt was determined from the inclination of a line connecting the lateral and medial canthi, then classified as class I, II, or III.
Results:Mean differences in pupil level, medial canthi, and lateral canthi were 1.57±1.10 mm, 1.14±1.07 mm, and 2.03±1.64 mm, respectively. The mean degree of canthal tilt were 8.45°±3.53° for the right side and 8.42°±3.81° for the left side. No study participants presented with class III canthal tilt. The mean canthal tilt values for those with class I tilt were 3.21°±1.68° for the right side and 3.18°±1.63° for the left side, while, for those who had class II tilt, the values were 9.60°±3.66° for the right side and 9.54°±2.99° for the left side.
Conclusion:The presented diagnostic method of orbital dystopia can be used to effectively establish a treatment plan that takes into consideration the patient’s skeletal and soft-tissue discrepancies.
