The Retrospective Analysis of Prognostic Significance of Smoking Status in Bladder Cancer.
10.22465/kjuo.2017.15.3.111
- Author:
Sung Han KIM
1
;
Sohee KIM
;
Yoon Seok SUH
;
Jung Kwon KIM
;
Jae Young JOUNG
;
Jinsoo CHUNG
;
Weon Seo PARK
;
Kang Hyun LEE
;
Ho Kyung SEO
Author Information
1. Center for Prostate Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea. seohk@ncc.re.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Bladder cancer;
Muscles;
Invasiveness;
Smoking;
Prognosis
- MeSH:
Administration, Intravesical;
Carcinoma in Situ;
Disease-Free Survival;
Female;
Humans;
Muscles;
Prognosis;
Retrospective Studies*;
Risk Factors;
Smoke*;
Smoking Cessation;
Smoking*;
Tobacco Products;
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms*;
Urinary Bladder*
- From:Korean Journal of Urological Oncology
2017;15(3):111-120
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of smoking status in muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and non-MIBC in recurrence-free (RFS), progression-free (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 541 patients with MIBC and non-MIBC who were surgically treated during 2002–2013. Smoking status was defined as never smokers (NS; n=160, 30%), former smokers (FS; smoking cessation for ≥1 year, n=176, 33%), and current smokers (CS; >100 cigarettes, n=198, 37%). We statistically compared these groups' clinicopathological facCtors for the predictive factors for RFS and PFS for non-MIBC (NMIBC) and DFS for MIBC, and CSS using multivariate model. RESULTS: The CS, FS, and NS groups exhibited insignificantly different pathological staging, grades, and immunohistological characteristics (p>0.05). Among the 441 patients with NMIBC, pathologic tumor size was a significant risk factor for RFS (1–3 cm: hazard ratio [HR], 1.88; >3 cm: HR, 2.21; p < 0.05); age (HR, 1.06), intravesical therapy (HR, 0.25), and high-grade cancer (HR, 8.33) significant for PFS; and age (HR, 1.08), intravesical instillation (HR, 0.26), and smoking status (FS: HR, 0.40; CS: HR, 0.44) significant for CSS (p < 0.05). The 93 patients with MIBC had no significant risk factors for DFS, although their significant risk factors for CSS were age (HR, 1.05), female sex (HR, 2.64), and carcinoma in situ (HR, 4.72) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Smoking status only significantly affected CSS in patients with NMIBC.
