Anaerobic Bacterial Isolation in Patients with Chronic Prostatitis Syndrome.
- Author:
Jeong Hoon JANG
1
;
Sung Jin KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, WonJu College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Chronic prostatitis;
EPS(Expressed prostatic secretion);
Aerobic and anaerobic culture
- MeSH:
Actinomyces;
Age Distribution;
Bacteria, Anaerobic;
Bacteroides;
Dysuria;
Eubacterium;
Hemospermia;
Humans;
Incidence;
Microscopy;
Peptostreptococcus;
Prevotella;
Prostate;
Prostatitis*;
Transportation
- From:Korean Journal of Urology
1994;35(6):640-645
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
In a general way, anaerobic isolation is troublesome and needs competent personnel and fittings. In addition, bacterial isolation from the prostate is disappointing because of difficulty in interpretation of the results. In this experiment, we tried the best way to isolate anaerobes from the prostate in terms of processing of the specimens such as catching, transportation, etc. We performed this antegrade experiment for 12 months in 1992 and got the results from 43 patients with chronic prostatitis syndrome as follows. l. Age distribution was in broad range between 20 and 54 showing peak incidence in 31-40 years(49% ) and the next in 20-30 years( 30%). 2. Subjective symptoms and signs consisted of perineal discomfort, suprapubic discomfort, frequency, urethral discomfort, dysuria, morning drop, testicular discomfort, and hemospermia 3. Majority of the cases( 36 cases. 83.7% ) were normal in the microscopy of VB1 EPS of 31 cases(72%) showed WBC more than 10/HPF. VB3 of 23 cases(53.5% ) showed than l0/HPF 4. A total of 40 cases showed aerobes in EPS and/or VB3 by culture. However, only 8 cases showed aerobes in EPS and/or VB, exclusive of 32 cases in which aerobes also appeared in VB1. 5. Anaerobic bacteria were cultured only from EPS for a total of 8 cases. There were 2 cases with Bacteroides species, 2 cases with Prevotella bivia, 2 cases with Peptostreptococcus anaerobrus,2 cases with Actinomyces meyeri, 1 case with Eubacterium lentum and 1 case with Eubacterium limosum.
