Comparative Study of Pinless Navigation System versus Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty
- Author:
Prashant PAWAR
1
;
Lokesh NAIK
;
Dipit SAHU
;
Vaibhav BAGARIA
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2021;13(3):358-365
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:Optimal placement of the components and achieving a neutral mechanical axis are the main goals of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Different computerised navigation systems are presently used for these purposes. This aim of this study was to compare the pinless navigation (PNA) TKA performed using iAssist with the conventional instrumented (CIN) TKA in terms of functional and radiological outcomes.
Methods:A total of 100 knees operated for TKA by a single surgeon were studied retrospectively for a period of 2 years. Weightbearing postoperative radiographs of the knees along with scanograms of the lower limbs were used for measurements of component positioning, mechanical axis alignment, and number of outliers. Oxford knee scoring was used for functional analysis.
Results:No statistically significant difference was seen in the mean mechanical axis alignment (hip-knee-ankle angle), coronal alignment (α and β angles) and sagittal alignment (γ and δ angles) of the femoral and tibial components between the two groups. Though the percentage of outliers for mechanical axis alignment was lower in the PNA-TKA group than in the CIN-TKA group, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.73). The number of outliers for the femoral and tibial component positioning in coronal and sagittal planes was not statistically significantly different between the two groups. No statistically significant difference (p = 0.68) was noted between the two groups with respect to the Oxford Knee Score. The mean surgical time was greater in the PNA-TKA group by 11 minutes, which was statistically significantly longer (p = 0.018). Complications were seen in 6.89% of the cases in the CIN-TKA group, while none in the PNA-TKA group.
Conclusions:The accurate mechanical axis alignment and component positioning can be achieved with the conventional instrumentation, so the use of PNA system, which adds to the surgical cost, is questionable. Also, equally good short-term functional outcome can be achieved with the conventional instrumentation. The surgeon must be accustomed with the instrumentation of the PNA system, or it adds to the surgical time.
