Comparison of medical care utilization patterns between beneficiaries of medical aid and medical insurance.
10.12701/yujm.1991.8.2.185
- Author:
Bok Youn KIM
;
Seok Beom KIM
;
Chang Yoon KIM
;
Pock Soo KANG
;
Jong Hak CHUNG
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Medical care utilization pattern;
Medical aid;
Medical insurance
- MeSH:
Chronic Disease;
Daegu;
Family Characteristics;
Financial Management;
Gastrointestinal Diseases;
Hand;
Humans;
Insurance Benefits;
Insurance*;
Musculoskeletal Diseases;
Pharmacy;
Referral and Consultation;
Surveys and Questionnaires
- From:Yeungnam University Journal of Medicine
1991;8(2):185-201
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
A household survey was conducted to compare the patterns of morbidity and medical care utilization between medical aid beneficiaries and medical insurance beneficiaries. The study population included 285 medical aid beneficiaries that were completely surveyed and 386 medical insurance beneficiaries selected by simple random sampling from a Dong (Township) in Taegu. Well-trained surveyors mainly interviewed housewives with a structured questionnaire. The morbidity rates of acute illness during the 15-day period, were 63 per 1,000 medical aid beneficiaries and 62 per 1,000 medical insurance beneficiaries. The rates for chronic illness were 123 per 1,000 medical beneficiaries and 73 per 1,000 medical insurance beneficiaries. The most common type of acute illness in medical aid and medical insurance beneficiaries was respiratory disease in medical aid beneficiaries, musculoskeletal disease was most common, but in medical insurance beneficiaries, gastrointestinal disease was most common. The mean duration of acute illness of medical aid beneficiaries was 3.8 days and that of medical insurance beneficiaries was 6.8 days. During the one year period, mean duration of medical aid beneficiaries chronic illnesses was 11.5 months which was almost twice as long compared to medical insurance beneficiaries. Pharmacy was most preferable facility among the acute illness patient in medical aid beneficiaries, but acute cases of medical insurance beneficiaries visited the clinic most commonly. Chronic cases of both groups visited the clinic most frequently. There were some findings suggesting that much unmet need existed among the medical aid beneficiaries. In acute cases, the average number of days of medical aid users utilized medical facilities was less than medical insurance users. On the other hand, the length of medical care utilization of chronic cases was reversed. Geographical accessibility was the most important factors in utilization of medical facilities. Almost half of the study population answered the questions about source of funds on medical security correctly. Most respondents considered that the objective of medical security was affordability. The chief complaint on hospital utilization was the complicated administrative procedures. These findings suggest that there were some problems in the medical aid system, especially in the referral system.
