External Validation of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II in Korean Intensive Care Units.
10.3349/ymj.2013.54.2.425
- Author:
Jae Yeol KIM
1
;
So Yeon LIM
;
Kyeongman JEON
;
Younsuck KOH
;
Chae Man LIM
;
Shin Ok KOH
;
Sungwon NA
;
Kyoung Min LEE
;
Byung Ho LEE
;
Jae Young KWON
;
Kook Hyun LEE
;
Seok Hwa YOON
;
Jisook PARK
;
Gee Young SUH
Author Information
1. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Validation Studies
- Keywords:
APACHE II;
calibration;
discrimination;
intensive care units;
illness severity
- MeSH:
*APACHE;
Aged;
Cohort Studies;
Critical Illness/mortality;
Hospital Mortality;
Humans;
*Intensive Care Units;
Middle Aged;
Risk Factors
- From:Yonsei Medical Journal
2013;54(2):425-431
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: This study was designed to validate the usefulness of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II for predicting hospital mortality of critically ill Korean patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data on 826 patients who had been admitted to nine intensive care units and were included in the Fever and Antipyretics in Critical Illness Evaluation study cohort. RESULTS: Among the patients enrolled, 62% (512/826) were medical and 38% (314/826) were surgical patients. The median APACHE II score was 17 (11 to 23 interquartile range), and the hospital mortality rate was 19.5%. Age, underlying diseases, medical patients, mechanical ventilation, and renal replacement therapy were independently associated with hospital mortality. The calibration of APACHE II was poor (H=57.54, p<0.0001; C=55.99, p<0.0001), and the discrimination was modest [area under the receiver operating characteristic (aROC)=0.729]. Calibration was poor for both medical and surgical patients (H=63.56, p<0.0001; C=73.83, p<0.0001, and H=33.92, p<0.0001; C=33.34, p=0.0001, respectively), while discrimination was poor for medical patients (aROC=0.651) and modest for surgical patients (aROC=0.704). At the predicted risk of 50%, APACHE II had a sensitivity of 36.6% and a specificity of 87.4% for hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: For Koreans, the APACHE II exhibits poor calibration and modest discrimination for hospital mortality. Therefore, a new model is needed to accurately predict mortality in critically ill Korean patients.
