Mandibular shape prediction using cephalometric analysis: applications in craniofacial analysis, forensic anthropology and archaeological reconstruction
10.1186/s40902-020-00282-3
- Author:
Ahmed OMRAN
1
;
David WERTHEIM
;
Kathryn SMITH
;
Ching Yiu Jessica LIU
;
Farhad B. NAINI
Author Information
1. Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Galsworthy Road, Kingston upon Thames, KT2 7QB, UK
- Publication Type:Research
- From:Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
2020;42(1):37-
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:The human mandible is variable in shape, size and position and any deviation from normal can affect the facial appearance and dental occlusion.
Objectives:The objectives of this study were to determine whether the Sassouni cephalometric analysis could help predict two-dimensional mandibular shape in humans using cephalometric planes and landmarks.
Materials and methods:A retrospective computerised analysis of 100 lateral cephalometric radiographs taken at Kingston Hospital Orthodontic Department was carried out.
Results:
Results:showed that the Euclidean straight-line mean difference between the estimated position of gonion and traced position of gonion was 7.89 mm and the Euclidean straight-line mean difference between the estimated position of pogonion and the traced position of pogonion was 11.15 mm. The length of the anterior cranial base as measured by sella-nasion was positively correlated with the length of the mandibular body gonion-menton, r = 0.381 and regression analysis showed the length of the anterior cranial base sella-nasion could be predictive of the length of the mandibular body gonion-menton by the equation 22.65 + 0.5426x, where x = length of the anterior cranial base (SN). There was a significant association with convex shaped palates and oblique shaped mandibles, p = 0.0004.
Conclusions:The method described in this study can be used to help estimate the position of cephalometric points gonion and pogonion and thereby sagittal mandibular length. This method is more accurate in skeletal class I cases and therefore has potential applications in craniofacial anthropology and the ‘missing mandible’ problem in forensic and archaeological reconstruction.
