- Author:
Ju Hee KIM
1
;
Sa Ra LEE
;
Eun Sil LEE
;
Sung Hoon KIM
;
Hee Dong CHAE
Author Information
- Publication Type:REVIEW ARTICLE
- From:Journal of Menopausal Medicine 2020;26(3):154-158
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: For patients with apical compartment pelvic organ prolapse (POP), abdominal sacrocolpopexy has been considered superior to the vaginal approach in terms of less dyspareunia and decreased risk of recurrence. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RSC) can help overcome difficulties in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) by facilitating deep dissection and suturing. Moreover, RSC is a safe and efficacious option for patients with POP. It has several benefits, such as its high anatomical cure rate, improvement of sexual function, reduction of perioperative complications, and low recurrence rate. In addition, it can be a safe option for elderly patients. RSC has a steep learning curve and numerous other reported advantages compared with LSC; however, insufficient data conclude that the former is universally superior, especially in cost effectiveness. Thus, further studies are needed to support the widespread adoption of robot-assisted surgery for pelvic floor reconstruction.