Survival, Prognosis, and Clinical Feature of Refractory Myasthenia Gravis: a 15-year Nationwide Cohort Study
10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e242
- Author:
Sohyun JEONG
1
;
Yunha NOH
;
In-Sun OH
;
Yoon-Ho HONG
;
Ju-Young SHIN
Author Information
1. Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Journal of Korean Medical Science
2021;36(39):e242-
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare classic autoimmune disease where immunosuppressant therapies have been successful to reduce MG attributable mortality fairly well. However, patients with refractory MG (rMG) among the actively treated MG (aMG) are nonresponsive to conventional therapy and display high disease severity, which calls for further research. We aimed to determine survival, prognosis, and clinical feature of patients with rMG compared to non-rMG.
Methods:Retrospective nationwide cohort study using Korea's healthcare database between 2002 and 2017 was conducted. Patients with rMG (n = 47) and non-rMG (n = 4,251) who were aged > 18 years, followed-up for ≥ 1 year, and prescribed immunosuppressants within 2 years after incident MG diagnosis were included. Patients with rMG were defined as administered plasma exchange or intravenous immunoglobulin at least 3 times per year after receiving ≥ 2 immunosuppressants. All-cause mortality, myasthenic crisis, hospitalization, pneumonia/ sepsis, and emergency department (ED) visits were measured using Cox proportional hazard models and pharmacotherapy patterns for rMG were assessed.
Results:The rMG cohort included a preponderance of younger patients and women. The adjusted hazard ratio was 2.49 (95% confidence interval, 1.26–4.94) for mortality, 3.14 (2.25–4.38) for myasthenic crisis, 1.54 (1.15–2.06) for hospitalization, 2.69 (1.74–4.15) for pneumonia/sepsis, and 1.81 (1.28–2.56) for ED visits for rMG versus non-rMG. The immunosuppressant prescriptions were more prevalent in patients with rMG, while the difference was more remarkable before rMG onset rather than after rMG onset.
Conclusion:Despite the severe prognosis of rMG, the strategies for pharmacotherapeutic regimens were similar in those two groups, suggesting that intensive monitoring and introduction of timely treatment options in the early phase of MG are required.
