Skin Exposure Contributes to Chemical-Induced Asthma: What is the Evidence? A Systematic Review of Animal Models
10.4168/aair.2020.12.4.579
- Author:
Hung-Chang TSUI
1
;
Steven RONSMANS
;
Laurens J De SADELEER
;
Peter H. M. HOET
;
Benoit NEMERY
;
Jeroen A. J. VANOIRBEEK
Author Information
1. Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Publication Type:Review Article
- From:Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research
2020;12(4):579-598
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
It is generally assumed that allergic asthma originates primarily through sensitization via the respiratory mucosa, but emerging clinical observations and experimental studies indicate that skin exposure to low molecular weight (LMW) agents, i.e. “chemicals,” may lead to systemic sensitization and subsequently develop asthma when the chemical is inhaled. This review aims to evaluate the accumulating experimental evidence that adverse respiratory responses can be elicited upon inhalation of an LMW chemical sensitizer after previous sensitization by dermal exposure. We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases up to April 15, 2017, and conducted forward and backward reference tracking. Animal studies involving both skin and airway exposure to LMW agents were included. We extracted 6 indicators of “selective airway hyper-responsiveness” (SAHR)—i.e. respiratory responses that only occurred in previously sensitized animals—and synthesized the evidence level for each indicator into strong, moderate or limited strength. The summarized evidence weight for each chemical agent was graded into high, middle, low or “not possible to assess.” We identified 144 relevant animal studies. These studies involved 29 LMW agents, with 107 (74%) studies investigating the occurrence of SAHR. Indicators of SAHR included physiological, cytological/histological and immunological responses in bronchoalveolar lavage, lung tissue and airway-draining lymph nodes. Evidence for skin exposure-induced SAHR was present for 22 agents; for 7 agents the evidence for SAHR was inconclusive, but could not be excluded. The ability of a chemical to cause sensitization via skin exposure should be regarded as constituting a risk of adverse respiratory reactions.
