Finite element analysis of different intramedullary fixation methods for the treatment of senile pubic ramus fractures.
10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2021.07.015
- Author:
Yong-Ze ZHENG
1
;
Xin-Min CHEN
1
;
Li-Qin ZHENG
1
;
Mu-Sheng LI
1
;
Zi-Yi LIANG
1
;
Zi-Ling LIN
1
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopaedics Trauma, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lingnan Medical Research Center, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Finite element analysis;
Fracture fixation, intramedullary;
Pubic bone
- MeSH:
Biomechanical Phenomena;
Bone Screws;
Finite Element Analysis;
Fracture Fixation, Internal;
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary;
Fractures, Bone/surgery*;
Humans;
Spinal Fractures
- From:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2021;34(7):665-669
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the biomechanical stability of elastic intramedullary nail in the treatment of pubic ramus fractures by finite element analysis, and to compare the stability of elastic intramedullary nail with cannulated screw intramedullary fixation.
METHODS:The CT data of the pelvis of a volunteer were selected, and the three-dimensional model of the pelvis was reconstructed by reverse engineering software and the fracture of the pubic ramus fractures was simulated by osteotomy. The hollow nail model, single elastic nail model and double elastic nailmodel were assembled with different implants respectively. The mesh division, material assignment loading and other steps were carried out in the ANSYS software, and then the calculation was submitted.
RESULTS:The overall displacement of the pelvis of the elastic nail model was smaller than that of the cannulated screw model, in which the double elastic nail model had the smallest overall displacement, but the cannulated screw model had the smallest plant displacement and the single elastic nail model had the largest plant displacement. Although the stress of cannulated screw was small, there was obvious stress concentration, the stress of elastic nail was large, but there was no obvious stress concentration, especially the stress distribution of double elastic nail was more uniform and the overall stress of pelvis was the smallest.
CONCLUSION:All the three fixation methods can effectively improve the stability of the anterior ring of the pelvis. Among them, there is no significant difference in the overall biomechanical propertiesof hollow nail fixation and double elastic nail fixation, which is better than that of single elastic nail fixation. Elastic nail fixation has the advantages of minimally invasive surgery and good biomechanical stability, so it can be used as a better surgical method for the treatment of pubic ramus fractures.
