Analysis of clinical research outcome indicators of traditional Chinese medicine in treatment of diabetic foot.
10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20201218.501
- Author:
Ke-Yi WANG
1
;
Yi OU
1
;
Chun-Xiang LIU
1
;
Jun-Hua ZHANG
1
;
Xin-Yue DAI
2
;
Rui GAO
2
Author Information
1. Center of Evidence-based Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Tianjin 301617, China.
2. Xiyuan Hospital, Chinese Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Beijing 100091, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
core outcome set;
diabetic foot;
outcome indicator;
randomized controlled trial;
traditional Chinese medicine
- MeSH:
Blood Glucose;
Diabetes Mellitus;
Diabetic Foot/drug therapy*;
Drugs, Chinese Herbal/therapeutic use*;
Humans;
Medicine, Chinese Traditional;
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic;
Treatment Outcome
- From:
China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica
2021;46(15):4008-4015
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
To analyze the outcome indicators from the randomized controlled trials(RCTs) on traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) treatment for diabetic foot, and to lay a foundation for the establishment of the core index set of the clinical trials on TCM treatment of diabetic foot. Computer retrieval of RCTs on TCM treatment of diabetic foot was performed in CNKI, Wanfang, SinoMed, PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMbase and Web of Science databases. Literature screening and data extraction were conducted independently by two researchers in strict accordance with inclusion and exclusion criteria. Any difference was resolved through discussion. A total of 72 RCTs involving 5 791 patients were included and 204 indicators were used. The number of indicators used in a single study was 2-22, with an average of 3 indicators used for each RCT. The indicators with top 16 frequency were clinical total effective rate, ankle brachial index(ABI), ulcer area, TCM syndrome integral, fibrinogen(FIB), fasting blood glucose(FBG), plasma viscosity(PV), c-reactive protein(CRP), saccharification blood of eggs(HbAlc), 2 h postprandial blood glucose(2 hPG), wound healing time, triglyce-rides(TC), TCM efficacy for syndromes, total cholesterol(TG), percutaneous oxygen partial pressure(TCPO2) and TCM symptom scores. The difference in selection of RCT indicators was large among TCM treatment methods for diabetic foot, and the combination of outcome indicators was arbitrary. The description on indexes was not standardized. Some non-laboratory examination indicators, some indicators not recommended in guidelines or not recognized in clinical practice, and some self-made indicators were not explained in detail. There was a lack of standardized evaluation criteria for indicators. The indicators had large time-point difference in measurement, and the time points were not distinguished in the measurement for diabetic foot patients with different degrees of severity. In addition, the patients with long course of treatment weren't timely measured. The characteristics of TCM or significant endpoint indicators were insufficient. It was urgent to establish the core index set of TCM in treating diabetic foot.
