Comparison of endogenetic microbial community diversity between wild Cordyceps sinensis,artificial C. sinensis and habitat soil.
10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20210226.103
- Author:
Jing-Yan YANG
1
;
Xin-Xin TONG
2
;
Cheng-Yan HE
1
;
Jing BAI
1
;
Fang WANG
2
;
Jin-Lin GUO
1
Author Information
1. Development and Utilization of Chinese Medicine Resources Key Laboratory Breeding Base, Key Laboratory of Systematic Research, the Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Standardization of Chinese Herbal Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Chengdu 611137, China College of Medical Technology, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Chengdu 611137, China.
2. Development and Utilization of Chinese Medicine Resources Key Laboratory Breeding Base, Key Laboratory of Systematic Research, the Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Standardization of Chinese Herbal Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Chengdu 611137, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
artificial Cordyceps sinensis;
bacterial community;
fungal community;
high-throughput sequencing;
wild Cordyceps sinensis
- MeSH:
Cordyceps/genetics*;
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing;
Microbiota/genetics*;
Soil;
Soil Microbiology
- From:
China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica
2021;46(12):3106-3115
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
To obtain the difference of the fungal and bacterial community diversity between wild Cordyceps sinensis, artificial C. sinensis and their habitat soil, Illmina Hiseq high-throughput sequencing technology was applied. The results show that Proteobacteria was the dominant bacterial phylum in C. sinensis, Actinobacteria was the dominant bacterial phylum in soil microhabitat, Ophiocordyceps sinensis was the predominant dominant fungus of C. sinensis. The α diversity analysis showed that the fungal diversity of stroma was lower than other parts, and the fungal diversity of wild C. sinensis was lower than that of artificial C. sinensis. The β diversity analysis showed that the fungal and bacterial community diversity of soil microhabitat samples was significantly different from that of C. sinensis. The fungal community diversity was less different between wild and artificial C. sinensis, especially in sclerotia. LEfSe analysis showed a lot of species diversity between wild and artificial C. sinensis. Those different species between wild C. sinensis, artificial C. sinensis and their habitat soil provide ideas for further research on breed and components of C. sinensis.
