Efficacy of Diclofenac versus Caroverine in the ED Treatment of Acute Ureteral Colic.
- Author:
Kwang Jung LEE
1
;
Sung Eun KIM
;
Young Jin CHEON
Author Information
1. Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Woman's University, Korea. kcssis@mm.ewha.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Clinical Trial ; Original Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial
- Keywords:
Ureteral colic;
Diclofenac;
Caroverine
- MeSH:
Diclofenac*;
Emergency Service, Hospital;
Humans;
Narcotics;
Parasympatholytics;
Prospective Studies;
Renal Colic*;
Ureter*
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
2001;12(4):426-432
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Ureteral colic due to acute obstruction of urine flow is a frequent and painful condition presenting in the emergency department. Proper control of ureteral colic is important in the management of such a patient. Many drugs, including narcotics, had been used to control ureteral colic, and of them, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are most commonly used. This study was carried out to compare the analgesic effect of diclofenac with that of caroverine which is used empirically in ureteral colic. METHODS: We carried out a randomized, prospective clinical trial in the emergency department of a university hospital. Sixty patients in whom ureteral colic had been diagnosed on the basis of physical signs and symptoms were included in this study. Each patients received an IM dose of diclofenac 75 mg, a IV bolus dose of caroverine 20 mg, or a continuous infusion of caroverine 60 mg. An additional dose of medication was added 20 min after the initial medication if needed. RESULTS: The main outcome was measured by using both the visual analogue scale(VAS), four-point categorial pain scale at times of 20, 40, and 60 min after initial medication. The requirement for supplemental medication was also measured. At 40 min, diclofenac was more effective than the other two treatments according to its pain- relieving capacity(p<0.05) and the categorial pain scale. By 60 min, caroverine continuous infusion was less effective than the other two treatments according to visual analogue scale(VAS) and the categorial pain scale(p<0.05). There were no significant differences between the diclofenac group and the caroverine bolus injection group at this time. The diclofenac group needed significantly less rescue medication for pain control(p<0.05). CONCLUSION: IM diclofenac, a non-steroidal antiinflammatory drug, was superior to the spasmolytics, single bolus or continuous intravenous infused, in treatment of ureteral colic.
