Evaluation of representative research works in pharmaceutical field based on Z-index model
10.11665/j.issn.1000-5048.20210414
- VernacularTitle:基于指数模型的药学科研人员代表作评析
- Author:
Zuoqi DING
1
;
Furong LI
;
Jinnan SUN
;
Haiping HAO
Author Information
1. 中国药科大学理学院
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
representative work evaluation;
representative work selection;
-index' target='_blank'>-index;
Zq-index;
h-index core method;
Q1-PSA-CNCI
- From:
Journal of China Pharmaceutical University
2021;52(4):505-512
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
This paper aims to explore the feasibility of establishing a representative work screening method based on the academic recognition of the paper. Through comparative analysis of the strong and weak points of representative method, h-index core method, the subjective selection results by faculty applying for higher professional titles, and the academic recognition method established in this research (Q1 Journal-Percentile in Subject Area-Category Normalized Citation Impact, Q1-PSA-CNCI), representative works were introduced into the Z-index to form the Zh, Zr and Zq-index, and the correlations between the indicators were analyzed. Compared with other methods, the number of representative works obtained by the Q1-PSA-CNCI method is more reasonable. There was significant correlation among the indicators (P < 0.05), with no significant difference in the Zq-index among faculty evaluated for different professional titles (P > 0.05). Studies have shown that the Q1-PSA-CNCI method could help to screen representative works and was more reasonable than the number of representative works selected based on the other two methods, so Zq-index could be used as an indicator for representative work evaluation to provide reference for the qualitative evaluation of papers. It is more reasonable to improve the review process with the participation of "small peers".
