Evaluation of four Internet addiction scales in college students
10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.08.017
- VernacularTitle:四种网络成瘾量表在大学生中应用评价
- Author:
ZHANG Xueqing, ZHANG Kexin, ZHU Yunjiao, WEI Hongyuan, WANG Tianli, LU Xiaoyan, ZHANG Jianghui, ZHANG Zhihua
1
Author Information
1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics，School of Public Health，Anhui Medical University，Hefei (230032), China
- Publication Type:期刊文章
- Keywords:
Internet;
Behavior,addictive;
Mental health;
Questionnaires;
Students
- From:
Chinese Journal of School Health
2021;42(8):1193-1197
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the reliability of Internet Addiction Impairment Index (IAII), Revised Chen Internet Addiction Scale(CIAS-R)-Taiwan Revision, CIAS-R-Mainland Revision, Young Diagnostic Questionnaire (YDQ) and the consistency of Internet addiction using the four scales in college students.
Methods:A total of 1 004 undergraduates from 3 universities in Hefei were selected to measure the tendency of internet addiction simultaneously using the four scales, and 122 students were re tested two weeks after the initial assessment. Correlation coefficient, coincidence rate and Kappa value were used to analyze the consistency of the four scales. Analysis of variance, t test and Logistic regression were used to determine the consistency of the factors related to internet addiction scale.
Results:The reliability of the four Internet addiction scales were greater than 0.7( P <0.01). The correlation coefficient among all scales was greater than 0.5( P <0.01). The agreement between YDQ and CIAS-R-Mainland Revision was 0.87. The Kappa value of YDQ and CIAS-R-Taiwan Revision in the consistency analysis was 0.51( P <0.01), the Kappa value between the other scales was less than 0.5. Results showed that the four scales were consistent in Internet addiction prevalence by gender, grade and major, while CIAS-R-Taiwan Revision and YDQ were not consistent with the other two scales in sleep disorder.
Conclusion:The four Internet addiction scales all have good reliability, while low agreement in Internet addiction assessment, suggesting further improvement and revision in Internet addiction scales.
