Influencing factors for abnormal renal function markers in chronic hepatitis B patients receiving long-term oral administration of entecavir/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2021.08.011
- VernacularTitle:长期口服抗病毒药物的慢性乙型肝炎患者肾功能指标异常的影响因素分析
- Author:
Huibin NING
1
;
Huiming JIN
;
Kuan LI
;
Zhen PENG
;
Wei LI
;
Jia SHANG
Author Information
1. Department of Infectious Diseases, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou 450000, China
- Publication Type:Research Article
- Keywords:
Hepatitis B, Chronic;
Kidney Diseases;
Root Cause Analysis
- From:
Journal of Clinical Hepatology
2021;37(8):1798-1801.
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the status of abnormal renal function markers and related influencing factors in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients receiving oral antiviral drugs for a long time. MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 681 CHB patients who attended Henan Provincial People’s Hospital from January to December 2019 and received long-term oral administration of entecavir (ETV)/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). All patients received the measurement of blood renal function markers (urea, creatinine, retinol-binding protein ［RBP］, cystatin C ［Cys-C］, and β2-microglobulin ［β2-MG］), urinary renal function markers (α1-microglobulin ［α1-MG］, Cys-C, and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase ［NAG］), and urine routine parameters. The incidence rate of abnormal renal function markers were analyzed. The McNemar’s test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups, and the multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to investigate independent influencing factors for abnormal renal markers in urine. ResultsThe 681 patients had a mean age of 39.8±11.0 years and received medication for 1.88 (0.80-3.16) years. There were 417 male patients and 264 female patients, and the incidence rate of liver cirrhosis was 27.02% (184/681). Of all 681 patients, 442 received ETV and 239 received TDF. The measurement of blood renal function markers showed that urea, creatinine, retinol-binding protein, Cys-C, and β2-MG had an abnormal rate of 6.9% (47/681), 0.15% (1/681), 0(0/681), 2.21% (15/681), and 5.03% (30/681), respectively, and the abnormal rate of urinary protein was 7.29% (49/672). The measurement of urinary renal function markers showed that α1-MG, NAG, and Cys-C had an abnormal rate of 38.62% (263/681), 37.74% (257/681), and 19.38% (132/681), respectively. The abnormal rate of urine test was higher than that of blood test (P＜0.001). The multivariate logistic regression analysis with urinary α1-MG as the dependent variable showed that sex (odds ratio ［OR］=0.293, 95% confidence interval ［CI］: 0.204-0.419, P＜0.05), age (OR=1298, 95%CI: 1.108-1.521, P＜0.05), and type of nucleoside drug (OR=2.100, 95%CI: 1.431-3.083, P＜0.05) were influencing factors. The multivariate logistic regression analysis with urinary NAG as the dependent variable showed that age (OR=1.177, 95%CI: 1.008-1.375, P=0.040) was an influencing factor. ConclusionCompared with blood renal function markers, urinary renal function markers can identify renal injury earlier in CHB patients, and the elderly patients and the patients receiving TDF are more likely to develop abnormal renal function. However, it is not observed whether the duration of medication and liver cirrhosis can increase the risk of renal injury in CHB patients.
