Comparison of clinical effects between different procedures for breast augmentation
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0290.2021.01.003
- VernacularTitle:不同入路行假体隆乳术的效果比较
- Author:
Shaofu WANG
;
Zhenggang XIAO
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Aesthetics and Cosmetology
2021;27(1):11-13
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical effects between axillary approach, periareolar approach and inframammary fold approach in breast augmentation.Methods:Two hundred and eleven patients in our department from Jan. 2016 to Jan. 2018 were involved in this study. According to the surgical approach, the patients were divided into the axillary approach group, periareolar approach group and inframammary fold approach group. Postoperative pain, incision scar, drainage fluid and several complications were observed in three groups.Results:Postoperative VAS score of patients in inframammary fold approach and periareolar approach group was lower than that in the axillary approach group ( F=70.93, P<0.05), and postoperative drainage fluid was lower than in the axillary approach group. No diffrences were found in postoperative scar score among the three group ( P>0.05), and the nipple areola sensory disorder in the inframammary fold approach group was less. Conclusions:Breast augmentation of inframammary fold approach has the advantages of relatively hidden incision, short surgical approach, direct vision operation, mild pain, less surgical injury and low postoperative complications. It is worthy of being promoted.
