The value of pelvic peritoneum closure in laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer
10.3760/cma.j.cn113855-20201026-00821
- VernacularTitle:盆底腹膜关闭在低位直肠癌腹腔镜腹会阴联合切除术中的应用价值
- Author:
Feng WANG
;
Wei WANG
;
Rui DU
;
Dongliang LI
;
Jiajie ZHOU
;
Guifan TONG
;
Xu DING
;
Liuhua WANG
;
Dong TANG
;
Daorong WANG
- From:
Chinese Journal of General Surgery
2021;36(5):360-364
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the clinical value of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection(LAPR) with pelvic peritoneum closure for patients with low rectal cancer.Methods:The clinicopathological data of 90 patients with low rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection from Mar 2014 to Jan 2019 at the Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were divided into closed pelvic floor peritoneum group (study group, n=42) and without pelvic floor peritoneum group (control group, n=48) . Results:The postoperative hospital stay of the study group was shorter than that of the control group[(10.8±3.0) d vs. (12.4±3.1) d, t=2.569, P=0.013]. There was no statistically significant difference in the operation time , intraoperative blood loss , time to first flatus ,first time of getting out of bed between the two groups. Perineal incision infection and perineal incision dehiscence occurred in 2 cases and 1 case in the study group, and 10 cases and 9 cases in the control group respectively (χ 2= 5.007, P=0.025; χ 2=6.077, P=0.033). In the study group, there were 0 cases of perineal hernia, 1 case of pelvic floor peritoneal hernia and 2 cases of adhesive intestinal obstruction, while those in the control group were 7 cases, 8 cases and 9 cases, respectively (χ 2=6.642, P=0.013; χ 2=5.079, P=0.033; χ 2=4.085, P=0.043). Conclusion:Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection with pelvic peritoneum closure significantly reduces the incidence of postoperative perineal-related complications and shorten postoperative hospital stay.
