Effects of Dexmedetomidine on perioperative hemodynamics and postoperative sedation and analgesia in elderly patients treated with radical gastric cancer surgery
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-9026.2021.05.020
- VernacularTitle:右美托咪定对老年胃癌根治术患者围术期血流动力学及术后镇静镇痛的影响
- Author:
Xiaofeng YI
;
Shaoru WU
;
Yan PENG
- From:
Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
2021;40(5):637-640
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effects of Dexmedetomidine for supplemental anesthesia on perioperative hemodynamics and postoperative sedation and analgesia in elderly patients receiving radical gastric cancer surgery under general anesthesia.Methods:From January 2019 to April 2020, 63 patients admitted to our hospital for radical gastric cancer surgery were included as observation objects.They all underwent general anesthesia and were divided into the Dexmedetomidine group(odd-numbered group)and the normal saline group(even-numbered group)according to the parity of serial numbers the subjects were assigned to.Changes in perioperative hemodynamic index values and the amounts of anesthetic drugs used in the two groups were monitored and recorded, and postoperative sedation and analgesia effects were evaluated by using the Ramsay sedation scale and the visual analog scale(VAS).Results:The mean artery pressure(MAP)and heart rate(HR)were lower in the Dexmedetomidine group than in the normal saline group before anesthesia induction(T1), immediately after intubation(T3)and immediately after extubation(T5)( P<0.05). The Ramsay scores were higher and the VAS scores were lower in the Dexmedetomidine group than in the normal saline group at 1 h and 4 h after surgery( P<0.05). The doses of intraoperative propofol and remifentanil were lower in the Dexmedetomidine group than in the normal saline group[(1121.5±198.5)mg vs.(1395.6±332.7)mg, (3.1±0.9)mg vs.(5.5±1.2)mg, P<0.05]. Conclusions:The use of Dexmedetomidine for supplemental anesthesia can effectively maintain the stability of the patient's intraoperative hemodynamics and enhance the sedative and analgesic effects while reducing the amount of anesthetic drugs in patients receiving radical gastric cancer surgery under general anesthesia.
