Study of the application of low tube potemtial scanning in dacryocystography CT
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2021.03.010
- VernacularTitle:低管电压扫描技术在CT泪囊造影成像中的应用研究
- Author:
Lei ZHU
;
Yunfu LIU
;
Tianliang KANG
;
Yongxian ZHANG
;
Qinggang XU
;
Yongzhe WANG
;
Yantao NIU
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
2021;41(3):212-216
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the feasibility of the application of low tube potential scanning in dacryocystography CT.Methods:The mixture of iohexol and saline with the ration of 1∶3 as the dacryocyst was set on the nose wing of the head-neck phantom. The phantom was scanned at 80, 100, 120, 140 kV with appropriate mAs to set the volume CT dose index(CTDI vol)at 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 or 40 mGy. All the images were objectively evaluated to find out the optimal scanning parameters of 80 kV/240 mAs with the same contrast-to-noise ratio(CNR)of conventional scanning condition of 120 kV/180 mAs. A total of 62 patients who conducted dacryocystography CT in Beijing Tongren Hospital from November 2019 to July 2020 were prospectively selected. They were randomly divided equally into conventional scanning group with 120 kV/180 mAs and low tube potential group with 80 kV/240 mAs. The CT number, noise (SD) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the two groups were measured as the objective evaluation indicators of image quality. The subjective evaluation was performed by two senior radiologists using a double-blind method and a 5-scale system evaluation. Results:For the phantom study, the CNR was positively correlated with CTDI vol under the same tube potential ( r=0.985, 0.965, 0.971, 0.972, P < 0.05). With the same CNR, the radiation dose decreased with lower tube potential. Under the conventional scanning parameters of 120 kV/180 mAs, the CNR was 27.8. At the same CNR, the optimal scanning parameters were 80 kV/240 mAs. For the clinical study, the CTDI vol of conventional scanning group and low tube potential group were 31.2 and 12.8 mGy respectively, 59% decreased in low tube potential group. There were statistically significant differences in CT number of dacryocyst area, CT number of orbital fat area and noise between the two groups ( t=-3.476, 2.601, -5.704, P < 0.05). There was no statistically significante difference in CNR between 2 groups( P>0.05). Two observers had a good consistency ( Kappa >0.75). There was no statistically significante difference in subjective rating between 2 groups( P>0.05). Conclusions:Low tube potential scanning could obtain satisfactory image quality in dacryocystography CT at much lower radiation dose.
