Preoperative dosimetric comparison between non-coplanar and coplanar template-assisted 125I seed implantation for pancreatic cancers
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2021.01.009
- VernacularTitle:非共面与共面模板辅助 125粒子植入治疗胰腺癌术前剂量学对比
- Author:
Haitao SUN
;
Junjie WANG
;
Yuliang JIANG
;
Zhe JI
;
Fuxin GUO
;
Yi CHEN
;
Jinghong FAN
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
2021;41(1):42-45
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare preoperative planning parameters between non-coplanar and coplanar template-assisted radioactive seed implantation in the treatment of pancreatic cancers, in order to guide clinical application.Methods:Patients with pancreatic cancers who received external irradiation in the Peking University Third Hospital from Jan 2017 to May 2019 were selected.Their image information was imported into the brachytherapy planning system, and the non-coplanar plan and coplanar plan were designed individually.Each patient′s prescription dose was set to 110 Gy, and the activity of the radioactive seeds were 0.4 mCi(1 Ci=3.7×10 10Bq), respectively.For the two plans, the dose distribution was optimized and dosimetric parameters were compared, including the implantation needle number, the implanted seed number, the minimum prescription doses delivered to 90% and 100% of the target volume ( D90 and D100), mean percentages of volume receiving 100%, 150% and 200% of the prescription doses ( V100, V150 and V200), conformity index (CI), external index (EI), and homogeneity index (HI) of the target volume, as well as the doses of 2 cm 3 and 5 cm 3 ( D2 cm 3 and D5 cm 3) of the surrounding normal organs such as the small intestines, colon, duodenum, stomach, and spinal cord. Results:The implantation needle number in the coplanar plan was slightly higher than that in the non-coplanar plan, namely 18.63 vs. 16.45 ( t=-3.239, P <0.05). The implanted seed number was equivalent, namely 90.2 vs. 91.01, with no statistical difference ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference between D90, D100, V100, V150, V200, CI, EI, and HI in the target area of the two plans ( P>0.05). Meanwhile, there was no obvious difference in D2 cm 3 and D5 cm 3 of normal organs including the small intestines, colon, duodenum, stomach, and spinal cord ( P>0.05). Conclusions:With both the coplanar plan and the non-coplanar plan, the prescription doses can be achieved and meanwhile, there are very small differences in the doses of normal organs.Given that 3D-printing non-coplanar and coplanar templates have their own characteristics, it is necessary to choose them according to specific situations.
