Association between Microperimetric Parameters and Optical Coherent Tomographic Findings in Various Macular Diseases.
- Author:
Dong Yoon KIM
1
;
Hyun Seung YANG
;
Yoon Jun KOOK
;
Joo Yong LEE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Keywords: Ellipsoid portion of the photoreceptor inner segment; Microperimetry; Optical coherent tomography; Retinal thickness; Visual functionality
- MeSH: Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Fluorescein Angiography; Fundus Oculi; Humans; Macula Lutea/*pathology; Macular Edema/*diagnosis; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Tomography, Optical Coherence/*methods; Visual Field Tests/*methods
- From:Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2015;29(2):92-101
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: To analyze the correlation between microperimetric parameters and optical coherent tomographic findings in the eyes of patients with macular diseases. METHODS: A total of 64 eyes were included in this retrospective cross-sectional study. Differences in the macular integrity index and microperimetric parameters were analyzed according to types of outer retinal band defects. Correlations between average threshold values and retinal thickness in the corresponding areas were analyzed. Finally, microperimetric parameters were compared between inner and outer retinal lesions. RESULTS: Measures of best-corrected visual acuity, macular integrity index, and average threshold values were significantly worse in eyes with defects in the ellipsoid portion of the photoreceptor inner segment (ISe), the cone outer segment tip (COST), and the external limiting membrane (ELM) than in eyes without ISe, COST, and ELM defects. Also, visual functionality is more significantly impacted by ELM defects than by other hyper-reflective band defects. There was a significant negative correlation between retinal thickness and the average threshold of the corresponding area in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study grid. Microperimetric parameters in the eyes of patients with inner retinal lesions were better than in the eyes of patients with outer retinal lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The macular integrity index may be a useful factor for reflecting the functional aspects of macular diseases. Specifically, ELM, ISe, and COST defects are significantly associated with poor retinal sensitivity and macular integrity index values that suggest abnormalities. Among eyes with these particular defects, the visual functionality of patients is most sensitively impacted by ELM defects. This finding suggests that microperimetric parameters are sensitive and useful for evaluating functional abnormalities in the eyes of patients with macular disease, particularly in patients with outer retinal pathology.
