Single center retrospective analysis of emergency endoscopic therapy timing in esophagogastric variceal bleeding
10.3760/cma.j.cn431274-20210129-00142
- VernacularTitle:食管胃静脉曲张破裂出血急诊内镜干预时机的回顾性单中心队列研究
- Author:
Haiyan WU
;
Yong XIAO
;
Xu HUANG
;
Xinyue WAN
;
Wei ZHOU
;
Shijie YU
;
Mingkai CHEN
- From:
Journal of Chinese Physician
2021;23(3):333-337,342
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the optimal emergency endoscopy timing in patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EGVB).Methods:The clinical data of patients with EGVB emergency endoscopy in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from December 2018 to November 2020 were collected and analyzed. According to the time interval from admission to the start of emergency endoscopy, they were divided into emergency endoscopy group (<6 h, n=115) and early endoscopy group (6-24 h, n=57). The baseline data, clinical efficacy and postoperative situation of the two groups were compared, and the risk factors of 6-week mortality of EGVB emergency endoscopy were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results:In terms of baseline characteristics, there were no significant differences in age, gender, causes, shock index, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, charlson complication index (CCI) score, portal hypertension related complications between the two groups ( P<0.05). However, the albumin (ALB) in emergency endoscopy group was significantly lower than that in early endoscopy group ( P<0.001). There were significant differences in Child Pugh grading and Child Pugh score between the two groups ( P=0.002, P=0.001). In terms of endoscopic efficacy, the detection rate of bleeding site in emergency endoscopy group was significantly higher than that in early endoscopy group (90.4% and 73.7%, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in operation duration, immediate hemostasis success rate, 5-day rebleeding rate, rescue treatment demand and 6-week mortality between the two groups ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in bleeding related death between the two groups ( P>0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in blood product consumption, intensive care unit (ICU) stay and total hospital stay between the two groups ( P>0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that Child Pugh grade C ( P=0.018), MELD score ( P=0.005) and CCI score ( P=0.001) were independent risk factors for 6-week death outcome of EGVB patients, while emergency endoscopic intervention time was not related to 6-week death outcome ( P=0.5). Conclusions:The efficacy of early endoscopic intervention is no worse than that of emergency endoscopic intervention, except for the identification of bleeding site. Child-Pugh grade C, MELD score, and CCI score are the independent risk factors for 6-week mortality, while the timing of emergency endoscopy is not associate with 6-week mortality in EGVB patients.
