Validation of the revised method of the standard test method for iodine in water-cerium sulfate catalytic spectrophotometry
10.3760/cma.j.cn231583-20200217-00021
- VernacularTitle:水碘标准检验方法-硫酸铈催化分光光度法修订方法的验证研究
- Author:
Peizhen YANG
;
Shenghua CAI
;
Lansheng HU
;
Xianya MENG
;
Jing MA
;
Hongting SHEN
;
Yanan LI
;
Guanglan PU
;
Xun CHEN
;
Jinmei ZHANG
;
Xin ZHOU
;
Cuiling LA
- From:
Chinese Journal of Endemiology
2021;40(4):333-336
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To verify the revised method of cerium sulfate catalytic spectrophotometry for iodide index of "Standard Examination Methods for Drinking Water-Nonmetal Parameters" (GB/T 5750.5-2006).Methods:From July to September 2019, the Laboratory of Department for Endemic Disease Prevention and Control of Qinghai Institute for Disease Prevention and Control verified the revised method (determination of iodide in drinking water by cerium sulfate catalytic spectrophotometry) of cerium sulfate catalytic spectrophotometry (hereinafter referred to as original method) in "Standard Examination Methods for Drinking Water-Nonmetal Parameters" (GB/T 5750.5-2006). The revised method was verified according to the requirements of "Standard Examination Methods for Drinking Water-Water Analysis Quality Control" (GB/T 5750.3-2006), including standard curve, detection limit, precision, accuracy and actual sample determination.Results:The linear range of the revised method was 0 - 20.0 μg/L, the correlation coefficient was - 0.999 4 - 0.999 8, and the detection limit was 0.231 μg/L. The relative standard deviation ( RSD) of low, medium and high iodine water samples of 6 times detection ranged from 1.4% to 9.6%, and the recoveries of low and medium water samples ranged from 89.0% to 108.0%. The detection results of national first-class reference materials for iodine composition analysis in water were within the range of standard value ± uncertainty. There was no significant difference in the test of results of 12 tap water samples between the revised method and the original standard method ( t = - 0.075, P > 0.05). Conclusion:The revised method has a good linear relationship of standard curve, high precision and accuracy, and good reproducibility, is simple and easy to operate, and is suitable for promotion and application.
