Comparison of surgical results between single-hole laparoscopy and conventional laparoscopy in ovarian cystectomy
10.3760/cma.j.cn115455-20200927-01310
- VernacularTitle:经脐单孔腹腔镜在卵巢囊肿剔除手术中的应用
- Author:
Kangkang ZUO
;
Beibei HUANG
;
Huimin LI
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2021;44(4):332-336
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effect of single-port laparoscopy and conventional laparoscopic surgery in ovarian cystectomy.Methods:The clinical data of 139 patients with laparoscopic surgery for ovarian cyst admitted to the same department of gynecology from December 2016 to December 2019 in Suzhou Hospital Affiliated of Anhui Medical University were retrospectively analyzed, and they were divided into single-port laparoscopic surgery group (62 cases) and conventional laparoscopic surgery group (77 cases) according to different surgical methods. The clinical indictors, the levels of estrogen, T lymphocyte subgroups, the complications rate and incision satisfaction rate between two groups were compared.Results:The operation in both groups was smooth and there was no conversion to open surgery. Compared with the conventional laparoscopic surgery group, the surgery time, intraoperative blood loss in single-port laparoscopic surgery group were higher, the hospital stays in single-port laparoscopic surgery group was shorter, but there were no significant differences ( P>0.05). The levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol (E 2) in two groups before operation had no significant differences ( P>0.05). At 30 d after operation, the levels of FSH, LH and E 2 in single-port laparoscopic surgery group were higher than those in conventional laparoscopic surgery group, but the differences were no statistically significant ( P>0.05). Before operation, the levels of CD 4+, CD 8+ and CD 4+/CD 8+ in two groups has no significant differences ( P>0.05). At 3 d after operation, the levels of CD 4+, CD 8+ and CD 4+/CD 8+ in single-port laparoscopic surgery group were higher than those in conventional laparoscopic surgery group: 0.51 ± 0.03 vs. 0.47 ± 0.02, 0.41 ± 0.23 vs. 0.39 ± 0.05, 1.36 ± 0.02 vs. 1.24 ± 0.02, and the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05). The rate of complication in two groups had no significant difference ( P>0.05). At 3 d after operation, the scores of visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain in single-port laparoscopic surgery group were lower than that in conventional laparoscopic surgery group: (1.12 ± 0.21) scores vs. (3.56 ± 0.65) scores, and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05). The incision satisfaction rate in single-port laparoscopic surgery group was significantly higher than that in conventional laparoscopic surgery group: 90.32%(56/62) vs. 72.73%(56/77), and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Single-port laparoscopy can be safely and smoothly implemented in ovarian cystectomy, and can reduce postoperative pain, improve cell immunity, and have better cosmetic result.