Clinical application of noninvasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation and heated humidified high flow nasal cannula in sequential ventilator evacuation of premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4912.2021.03.002
- VernacularTitle:无创高频与加温湿化高流量鼻导管通气在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征序贯撤机的临床应用
- Author:
Jiebin WU
;
Jingfang ZHAI
;
Xiao LIU
;
Bao JIN
;
Yanbo WANG
;
Guangling ZHOU
;
Bin ZHOU
- From:
Chinese Pediatric Emergency Medicine
2021;28(3):165-170
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the clinical application of noninvasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation(nHFOV)and heated humidified high flow nasal cannula(HHHFNC)in sequential ventilator evacuation of preterm infants with very low birth weight with respiratory distress syndrome(RDS).Methods:A total of 88 preterm infants of very low birth weight with RDS were enrolled in the study, who had received endotracheal intubation invasive ventilation and were ready to be replaced by non-invasive ventilation at neonatal intensive care unit(NICU)of Xuzhou Central Hospital from May 2017 to January 2020.All premature infants were routinely treated with caffeine citrate.They were divided into two groups through random number table: nHFOV/HHHFNC group(45 cases)and continuous positive airway pressure(nCPAP)/oxygen hood group(43 cases). nHFOV was given after invasive ventilator removal and HHHFNC transition was followed after nHFOV withdrawal in the nHFOV/HHHFNC group, while nCPAP was given after invasive ventilator removal and oxygen hood was followed after nCPAP withdrawal in the nCPAP/oxygen hood group.The main observation consequences were compared with arterial blood gas indexes after invasive ventilator evacuation, weaning effect and the incidence of related complications.Results:(1)There were no statistically differences between the two groups in terms of gender, gestational age, birth weight, Apgar score at 1 min and 5 min after birth, the number of glucocorticoid usage in 24 h before delivery, the number of pulmonary surfactant usage, invasive ventilation time and RDS grading( P>0.05). (2)The PaO 2, PaCO 2and oxygenation index(OI=100×MAP×FiO 2/PaO 2)of the nHFOV/HHHFNC group at 1 h and 24 h after invasive ventilator removal showed significant difference compared with the nCPAP/oxygen hood group( P<0.05). The differences as the following listed were statistically significant( P<0.05)between the two groups, including the failure rate of invasive ventilation weaning during 72 h [9%(4/45)vs.26%(11/43)], the incidence of frequent apnea [7%(3/45)vs.23%(10/43)], the failure rate of nHFOV and nCPAP noninvasive ventilation weaning [4%(2/45)vs.21%(9/43)], the oxygen-used time [12.02(9.08~12.31)d vs.14.44(11.32~13.26)d] and the incidence of nasal injury [4%(2/45)vs.26%(11/43)]. (3)The time of the first noninvasive ventilation of nHFOV and nCPAP, the incidences of lung air leakage, neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis, grade Ⅲ to Ⅳ intraventricular hemorrhage, above stageⅡretinopathy, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and the mortality rate between the two groups showed no statistical significance( P>0.05). Conclusion:nHFOV and HHHFNC used in the sequential ventilator evacuation of RDS in preterm infants with very low birth weight could improve oxygenation, reduce CO 2retention, improve the success rate of machine weaning and reduce the occurrence of apnea and nasal injury.
