Influence of SBAR communication mode on patients with thoracolaparoscopic combined esophageal cancer resection
10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20200630-02948
- VernacularTitle:SBAR沟通模式对胸腹腔镜联合食管癌切除患者的影响
- Author:
Yan WANG
;
Huajun TANG
;
Yan CHENG
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2021;37(14):1084-1089
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To observe the influence of SBAR communication mode on the condition of patients undergoing thoracolaparoscopic combined with esophageal cancer resection.Methods:A total of 200 patients who were admitted to the Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology from October 2017 to October 2019 in Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University were selected for elective thoracolaparoscopic combined with esophageal cancer resection. According to the random number method, they were divided into 100 cases in the control group and the SBAR group. The control group used conventional preoperative communication visit mode, and the SBAR group used SBAR communication mode and preoperative visit based on the control group. The following items such as the preoperative negative mentality scores, quality of life score, postoperative complications and nursing satisfaction rate of the two groups before and after nursing interventionwere compared.Results:Before the intervention, the difference of the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores of the two groups was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). After the intervention, the SAS and SDS scores of the two groups were 49.32±4.96, 55.95±5.32, 50.93±4.74, and 56.33±5.89, respectively, which were significantly reduced. The SDS and SAS scores of the SBAR group were lower than those of the control group ( t values were -9.115 and -7.142, P<0.001). The difference of the World Health Organization Brief Table on Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) scores of the two groups before the intervention was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). After the intervention, the WHOQOL-BREF scores of the two groups were 12.27±1.39 vs. 9.18±1.24, 16.13±1.51 vs. 12.48±1.22, 16.13±1.95 vs. 12.71±1.28, 15.09±1.81 vs. 13.08±1.48, 18.11±1.82 vs. 13.51±1.47, 14.09±1.61 vs. 12.98±1.28. The scores of the SBAR group were higher than those of the control group ( t values were 5.397-19.662, P<0.001). The postoperative complications rate of the SBAR group was 3.00% (3/100), which was less than 18.00% (18/100) of the control group ( χ 2 value was 11.971, P<0.001). The overall satisfaction rate of patients in the SBAR group with care was 100.00% (100/100), which was higher than the 84.00% (100/100) in the control group ( χ 2 value was 17.391, P<0.001). Conclusions:In patients with esophageal cancer undergoing thoracic laparoscopy combined with esophageal cancer resection, the use of SBAR communication mode for the patient′s preoperative visit can significantly reduce the patient′s preoperative anxiety and depression negative scores and improve the patient′s quality of life, reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications, improve patient satisfaction with nursing with ideal effect.
