Porcine study on the efficacy of autogenous tooth bone in the maxillary sinus.
10.5125/jkaoms.2013.39.3.120
- Author:
Du Han LEE
1
;
Keun Yong YANG
;
Jeong Keun LEE
Author Information
1. Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dentistry, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea. arcady@ajou.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Autogenous tooth bone;
Miniature pig;
Histomorphometric study;
Maxillary sinus
- MeSH:
Bone Regeneration;
Bone Remodeling;
Durapatite;
Humans;
Light;
Male;
Maxillary Sinus;
Osteogenesis;
Swine;
Swine, Miniature;
Tissue Donors;
Tooth;
Transplants
- From:Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
2013;39(3):120-126
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to elucidate the effect of autogenous tooth bone material by experimenting on minipig's maxillary sinus and performing histological and histomorphometric analyses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five 18-24 month-old male minipigs were selected, and right maxillary sinuses were grafted with bone graft material made of their respective autogenous teeth extracted eight weeks earlier. The left sides were grafted with synthetic hydroxyapatite as control groups. All minipigs were sacrificed at 12 weeks after bone graft, which was known to be 1 sigma (sigma) period for pigs. Specimens were evaluated histologically under a light microscope after haematoxylin-eosin staining followed by semi-quantitative study via histomorphometric analysis. The ratio of new bone to total area was evaluated using digital software for calculation of area. RESULTS: All specimens were available, except one on the right side (experimental group), which was missing during specimen preparation. This study demonstrated new bone at the periphery of the existing bone in both groups, showing evidence of bone remodeling, however, encroachment of new bone on the central part of the graft at the 1 sigma period was observed only in the autogenous tooth bone group (experimental group). Histomorphometric analysis showed more new bone formation in the experimental group compared to the control group. Although the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05), the mean percentage area for new bone for the experimental and control groups were 57.19%+/-11.16% and 34.07%+/-13.09%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The novel bone graft material using autogenous tooth is a good alternative to autogenous bone, comparable to autogenous bone, and outperforming synthetic hydroxyapatite bone graft materials in terms of bone regeneration capacity. Augmentation with autogenous tooth bone materials will reduce donor site morbidity without hampering the safety of the autogenous bone graft.
