Curative effect analysis of different surgical methods in the treatment of adrenal tumors in children
10.3760/cma.j.cn101070-20191217-01262
- VernacularTitle:不同手术方式治疗儿童肾上腺肿瘤的疗效分析
- Author:
Yunjin WANG
;
Liu CHEN
;
Xu CUI
;
Kainan LIN
;
Xiaoqin XU
;
Chaoming ZHOU
- From:
Chinese Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics
2021;36(2):118-121
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic adrenalectomy and traditional open adrenalectomy for adrenal tumors in children.Methods:In Department of Pediatric Surgery, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children′s Hospital from June 2008 to June 2016, the clinical data of 31 pediatric adrenal tumors was retrospectively analyzed.According to different surgical methods, they were divided into traditional open adrenalectomy group and laparoscopic adrenalectomy group.Bleeding loss, operation duration, incision length, abdominal drainage time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications and recurrence were compared between the 2 groups.Results:There was no significant difference in age, sex, weight, and tumor size between the 2 groups (all P>0.05). The intraoperative bleeding loss was (18.06±4.86) mL for open adrenalectomy group and (15.20±4.48) mL for laparoscopic adrenalectomy group, and there existed no significant difference in the amount of bleeding between the 2 groups( T=-1.702, P>0.05). The operation duration was (137.44±19.32) min for open adrenalectomy group versus (134.80±6.21) min for laparoscopic adrenalectomy group, and there was no significant difference in operation duration between the 2 groups ( T=-0.504, P>0.05). The length of incision was (7.94±1.34) cm for open adrenalectomy group versus (3.44±0.21) cm for laparoscopic adrenalectomy group, the length of incision in laparoscopic group was shorter than that in open adrenalectomy group.There was significant difference in the length of incision between the 2 groups ( T=-12.843, P<0.001). The hospitalization time was (9.63±2.55) d for open adrenalectomy group versus (7.20±1.37) d for laparoscopic adrenalectomy group, the hospitalization time in laparoscopic group was shorter than those in open adrenalectomy group.The difference of operation time between the 2 groups was statistically significant ( T=-3.261, P=0.003). The average indwelling time of abdominal drainage tube was(5.94±1.53) d for open adrenalectomy group versus (4.80±1.74) d for laparoscopic adrenalectomy group, with no significant difference in postoperative abdominal drainage time between the 2 groups( T=-1.938, P>0.05). There was 1 case of retroperitoneal hematoma in laparoscopic adrenalectomy group and 2 cases of complications in open adrenalectomy group.There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the 2 groups ( P=1.000). There were 3 cases of distant metastasis and 1 case of recurrence in laparoscopic group, and 2 cases of distant metastasis and 1 case of recurrence in open adrenalectomy group.There was no significant difference in recurrence between the 2 groups ( P=1.000). Conclusions:Compared with open adrenalectomy surgery, laparoscopic adrenalectomy in children has various advantages, including beautiful incision, less trauma and fast recovery.However, it is necessary to select the appropriate cases.
