Clinical study of open surgery for small and middle abdominal wall incision hernia

Yake Chen; Dianchen Wang; Jianmin Chen; Yi Zhang; Pan QU; Xinguang Qiu

Return

Clinical study of open surgery for small and middle abdominal wall incision hernia

VernacularTitle:开放手术治疗中小型腹壁切口疝的临床研究
Author: Yake CHEN ; Dianchen WANG ; Jianmin CHEN ; Yi ZHANG ; Pan QU ; Xinguang QIU
From: International Journal of Surgery 2021;48(1):15-19
CountryChina
Language:Chinese
Abstract: Objective:To discuss the feasibility and value of open treatment for small and middle abdominal incision hernia repair.Methods:Retrospective analysis of 110 patients with abdominal wall incision hernia repair in our hospital from January 2016 to January 2018. They were divided into two groups according to the different operation, including open treatment group ( n=57)and laparoscopic treatment group ( n=53), the VAS efficacy scores, anal exhaust time, defecating time, removal of gastric tube time, removal of drainage tube time, first feed time, postoperative hospital stay time, hospitalization expenses were observed and analyzed respectively, measurement date with normal distribution were expressed as ( Mean± SD), comparisons between groups were analyzed using t test. Comparisons of count date between groups were analyzed using chi-square test. Results:All the patients were discharged, the VAS efficacy scores in open treatment about one day or three day and five day were (4.02±0.19), (2.21±0.26), (1.39±0.98) scores, the VAS efficacy scores in laparoscopic treatment were (4.68±0.62), (2.76±1.18), (1.84±0.62) scores, there were differences in complications between the two groups( P<0.05). The anal exhaust time, defecating time, removal of gastric tube time, removal of drainage tube time, first feed time of open treatment group were (50.73±14.69) h, (87.21±13.75) h, (9.64±3.92) h, (3.42±1.22) d, (37.11±9.76) h, and the laparoscopic treatment group were (65.14±9.54) h, (89.73±11.56) h, (11.43±5.61) h, (2.81±1.39) d, (38.92±7.59) h, there were differences complications between the two groups( P<0.05). The postoperative hospital stay time of open treatment group were (9.14±0.03) d, the postoperative hospital stay time of laparoscopic treatment group were (9.74±0.49) d, there were not differences in complications between the two groups( P<0.05). The hospitalization expenses in open treatment group were (1.51±0.36) ten thousand yuan, the hospitalization expenses in laparoscopic treatment group were(2.13±1.06) ten thousand yuan, there were differencesin complications between the two groups( P<0.05). Conclusion:Application of open treatment is feasible and effeetive for small and middle abdominal wall incision hernia.