Reliability and validity of Adversity Quotient Scale for nurses
10.11763/j.issn.2095-2619.2020.03.005
- Author:
Limei ZHU
1
;
Biqin YE
1
;
Liquan YANG
;
Yanfeng ZHANG
;
Jiansheng ZHENG
Author Information
1. Department of Nursing, Affiliated hospital of Putian University Putian, Fujian 351100, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Adversity quotient;
Scale;
Reliability;
Validity;
Nurse;
Assessment
- From:
China Occupational Medicine
2020;47(03):268-272
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability and validity of Adversity Quotient Scale in evaluating the adversity quotient among nurses. METHODS: A total of 409 nurses were selected as study subjects from three first-class hospitals in Fujian Province by cluster sampling method. The adversity quotient was investigated by Adversity Quotient Scale and its reliability and validity were tested. RESULTS: The Cronbach′s alpha coefficient, Spearman-Brown coefficient, Guttman Split-Harf coefficient and retest reliability of Adversity Quotient Scale were 0.931, 0.826, 0.823 and 0.940, respectively. The content validity ratio of Adversity Quotient Scale was 0.980. The scores of control, attribution, extension and tolerance factors were positively correlated with the total score of Adversity Quotient Scale(correlation coefficients were 0.813, 0.844, 0.874 and 0.822, respectively, P<0.05). Before model modification, the initial model fitting index of confirmatory factor analysis was χ~2/df=3.72, root mean square residual approximate(RMSEA)=0.09, the overall fitting of the model was not high. After model modification, the combined reliability of control, attribution, extension and tolerance factors were 0.780, 0.796, 0.831 and 0.871, respectively. The fitting index of the modified model was χ~2/df=3.08, RMSEA=0.07, showing a good fitting of the model. CONCLUSION: Adversity Quotient Scale has a good reliability and validity in the assessment of nurses, which can be a reliable and effective adversity quotient assessment tool.
