A Semi-Automated Method for Measuring White Matter Hyperintensity Volume.
10.12779/dnd.2013.12.1.21
- Author:
Yongsoo SHIM
1
;
Bora YOON
;
Yun Jeong HONG
;
A Hyun CHO
;
Dong Won YANG
Author Information
1. Department of Neurology, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. neuroman@catholic.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
White matter hyperintensities;
Magnetic resonance imaging;
Semi-automated quantification
- MeSH:
Artifacts;
Consensus;
Glycosaminoglycans;
Humans;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging;
Reproducibility of Results
- From:Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders
2013;12(1):21-28
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been considered as a reliable biomarker of small vessel damages. To evaluate the severity of WMHs, it is vital to develop reliable methods to measure the volume of WMHs. We applied open source software to measure WMH volume in the semi-automated way, and tested the reliability and validity by comparing with the commonly used qualitative rating scale. METHODS: Twenty five subjects with variable WMHs were recruited. ANALYZE 10.0 was used for the image processing and volumetric measurement of WMHs. The inhomogeneity and artifacts of signal were corrected with Insight Segmentation and Registration Toolkit in ANALYZE. For the gold standard of the WMH volumetric measurement, threshold method was applied with consensus of manual editing on each slice of the MRI images by two raters. Histogram of the all slices of the Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) MRI was generated to calculate the optimal voxel intensity of threshold, and the lowest voxel threshold was decided as the mean+1.4 SD. The volumes of WMHs were generated by multiplying the area and the thickness of each slice. Inter- and intrarater reliability of the semi-automated volumetric and Scheltens'methods, and the association between the individual methods were analyzed. RESULTS: The semi-automated WMH volume at the threshold of 1.4 SD as well as the gold standard volume was well correlated with the Scheltens' visual scale (r=0.75, p<0.001). The semi-automated volumetry showed the excellent intra-rater (ICC=0.9929; 95% CI, 0.9840-0.9968) and inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.9830; 95% CI, 0.9620-0.9925), superior to the Scheltens' visual rating scale. CONCLUSIONS: The semi-automated volume measurement of the WMHs with Analyze was a valid and a reliable method to quantify subcortical white matter damages of various etiologies.
