Wiltse approach combined with contralateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and conventional surgery for lumbar disc herniation:a case-control study.
10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2021.01.010
- Author:
Xu-Yu LIAO
1
;
Lei-Jie ZHOU
1
;
Wei-Hu MA
1
;
Guan-Yi LIU
1
;
Jin-Ming HAN
1
;
Rong-Ming XU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Spinal Surgery, Ningbo No.6 Hospital, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Case-control studies;
Intervertebral disc displacement;
Lumbar vertebrae;
Surgical procedures, operative
- MeSH:
Aged;
Case-Control Studies;
Female;
Humans;
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration;
Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery*;
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery*;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures;
Retrospective Studies;
Spinal Fusion;
Treatment Outcome
- From:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2021;34(1):51-57
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To compare the clinical effecty of Wiltse approach combined with contralateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and traditional TLIF in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation and its affect on injury of multifidus muscle.
METHODS:From June 2014 to September 2017, 90 patients with lumbar disc herniation combined with lumbar spine instability were divided into two groups (Wiltse approach group and traditional group) depend on the procedure of operation. Wiltse approach group was treated with Wiltse approach screw placement in one side combined with contralateral TLIF. There were 50 patients in Wiltse approach group, including 36 males and 14 females, aged 45 to 72 yearswith an average of (60.4± 3.1) years. The traditional group was treated with traditional TLIF operation. There were 40 patients in the traditional group, including 25 males and 15 females, aged 45 to 74 years with an average of (62.1±3.4) years. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, accuracy of screw implantation, postoperative drainage volume and drainage tube removal time were recorded in two groups. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)were observed before and 12 months after operation. All patients underwent CT examination preoperative and 12 months postoperative, and the CT values of bilateral multifidus muscle were measured.
RESULTS:All the patients were followed up, 40 patients in traditional group were 12 to 18 months with an average of (15.3±4.3) months; and 50 patients in Wiltse approach group were 13 to 24 months with an average of (16.5± 4.1) months. There were no statistically significant differences in operative time and intraoperative blood loss between two groups (
CONCLUSION:Compared with traditional surgical procedures, the Wiltse approach nail placement combined with contralateral TLIF has the advantage of accurate nail placement, reducing multifidus muscle damage, and reducing the incidence of postoperative intractable low back pain.
