Systematic review and Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of Compound Glycyrrhizin Injection in improving chronic hepatitis B liver damage.
10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20200705.501
- Author:
Hao-Nan WANG
1
;
Shi-Bing LIANG
2
;
Xiao-Ling YAO
1
;
Bao-Yong LAI
3
;
Tian-Yuan WEN
4
;
Ning SU
1
Author Information
1. School of Basic Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine Guangzhou 510006, China.
2. School of Basic Medicine, Shanxi University of Chinese Medicine Taiyuan 030619, China Center of Evidence-based Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Beijing 100029, China.
3. the Third Affiliated Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Beijing 100029, China.
4. the First Clinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Ji'nan 250355, China.
- Publication Type:Systematic Review
- Keywords:
Compound Glycyrrhizin Injection;
Meta-analysis;
chronic hepatitis B;
liver damage;
systematic review
- MeSH:
Drugs, Chinese Herbal/adverse effects*;
Glycyrrhizic Acid;
Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy*;
Humans
- From:
China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica
2021;46(3):694-702
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Compound Glycyrrhizin Injection(CGI) in improving liver damage in chronic hepatitis B(CHB). PubMed, Web of Science, SinoMed, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP databases were retrieved from their inception to February 10, 2020. The randomized controlled trial(RCT) of CGI in the treatment of CHB was included. Data were independently extracted by two authors, and the methodological quality was evaluated using the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool by other two authors. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. A total of 18 two-armed RCTs were included, involving 1 915 participants. The methodological quality of all studies included was generally low. In the comparison between CGI and diammonium glycyrrhizinate, the results showed that CGI was superior to the control group in improving the overall clinical effectiveness, but there was no statistical difference between the two groups in increasing ALT normalization rate, reducing ALT and AST level. In the comparison between CGI and diammonium glycyrrhizinate+other general hepatoprotective drugs, the results showed that CGI was superior to the control group in reducing AST level, while there was no statistical difference between the two groups in reducing ALT level and increasing overall clinical effectiveness. In the comparison between CGI+other commonly used drugs(including energy mixture, glutathione, vitamins, potassium magnesium aspartate) and diammonium glycyrrhizinate+other commonly used drugs, the results showed that CGI combined with other commonly used drugs was better than the control group in reducing ALT and AST level and improving the clinical total effective rate, and there was no statistical difference between the two groups in increasing the rate of ALT normalization. In the comparison between CGI+other commonly used drugs and other commonly used drugs, the results showed that CGI combined with other commonly used drugs was superior to the control group in reducing ALT and AST level and improving the overall clinical effectiveness. In the comparison between CGI+vitamins and diammonium glycyrrhizinate+potassium magnesium aspartate+vitamins, the results showed no statistical difference between the two groups in reducing AST level. A small number of studies included reported that CGI caused mild adverse reactions when used alone or in combination with other drugs. Based on the results, CGI has a certain effect in improving CHB liver damage, but the evidence is not enough to prove that CGI would cause serious adverse events. In the future, more well-designed and strictly-enforced RCT with an adequate sample size are needed to further evaluate the effect CGI in alleviating CHB liver damage.
