Association between use of amiodarone for non-valvular atrial fibrillation and patient survival: from the prospective China Atrial Fibrillation Registry.
10.1097/CM9.0000000000001270
- VernacularTitle:Association between use of amiodarone for non-valvular atrial fibrillation and patient survival: from the prospective China Atrial Fibrillation Registry
- Author:
Xiao-Xia HOU
1
;
Liu HE
2
,
3
;
Xin DU
2
,
3
;
Guo-Hong WANG
1
;
Jian-Zeng DONG
2
,
3
;
Chang-Sheng MA
2
,
3
Author Information
1. Cardiovascular Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100176, China.
2. Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University
3. National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing 100029, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Aged;
Amiodarone/therapeutic use*;
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use*;
Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy*;
China;
Humans;
Prospective Studies;
Registries
- From:
Chinese Medical Journal
2020;134(3):309-317
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND:Post hoc analysis of the landmark atrial fibrillation follow-up investigation of rhythm management trial revealed that amiodarone was associated with higher risks of mortality, intensive care unit admission, and non-cardiovascular death. We aim to evaluate the association between amiodarone use and patient survival under updated medical mode and level using data from the China Atrial Fibrillation (China-AF) Registry study.
METHODS:Clinical data of 8161 non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients who were antiarrhythmic drug (AAD)-naive before enrollment into the China-AF Registry, recruited between August 2011 and February 2017, were collected. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to evaluate the association between amiodarone use and the outcome. We also calculated the rate of sinus rhythm maintenance at the penultimate follow-up.
RESULTS:Compared with 6167 patients of non-AAD group, 689 patients of the amiodarone group were younger (mean age 65.6 vs. 68.6 years), more frequently completed high school education, had fewer comorbidities such as chronic heart failure, prior bleeding, and stroke, and were more likely to be treated in tertiary hospitals while less hospitalization. The proportion of persistent AF was much lower among users of amiodarone, who were also less likely to be taking oral anticoagulants. The patients in the amiodarone group had a statistically insignificant lower incidence of all-cause mortality (2.44 vs. 3.91 per 100 person-years) over a mean follow-up duration of 300.6 ± 77.5 days. After adjusting for potential confounders, amiodarone use was not significantly associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-1.49). Sub-group analysis revealed the consistent results. The rate of sinus rhythm maintenance at the penultimate follow-up in the amiodarone group was significantly higher than in the non-AAD group.
CONCLUSIONS:Our study indicated that amiodarone use was not significantly associated with a lower risk of 1-year all-cause mortality compared with a non-AAD strategy in "real-world" patients with NVAF.
