A Prospective Audit of Airway Code Activations and Adverse Events in Two Tertiary Hospitals.
10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2020242
- Author:
Yuen Mei CHOW
1
;
Zihui TAN
;
Chai Rick SOH
;
Shimin ONG
;
Jinbin ZHANG
;
Hao YING
;
Patrick WONG
Author Information
1. Department of Anaesthesiology, Division of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Sciences, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- From:Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore
2020;49(11):876-884
- CountrySingapore
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
INTRODUCTION:Airway management outside the operating room can be challenging, with an increased risk of difficult intubation, failed intubation and complications. We aim to examine airway practices, incidence of difficult airway and complications associated with airway code (AC) activation.
METHODS:We conducted a prospective audit of AC activations and adverse events in two tertiary hospitals in Singapore. We included all adult patients outside the operating room who underwent emergency intubation by the AC team after AC activation. Adult patients who underwent emergency intubation without AC activation or before the arrival of the AC team were excluded. Data were collected and documented by the attending anaesthetists in a standardised survey form shortly after their responsibilities were completed.
RESULTS:The audit was conducted over a 20-month period from July 2016 to March 2018, during which a total of 224 airway activations occurred. Intubation was successful in 218 of 224 AC activations, giving a success rate of 97.3%. Overall, 48 patients (21.4%) suffered an adverse event. Thirteen patients (5.8%) had complications when intubation was carried out by the AC team compared with 35 (21.5%) by the non-AC team.
CONCLUSION:Dedicated AC team offers better success rate for emergency tracheal intubation. Non-AC team attempted intubation in the majority of the cases before the arrival of the AC team. Increased intubation attempts are associated with increased incidence of adverse events. Equipment and patient factors also contributed to the adverse events. A multidisciplinary programme including the use of supraglottic devices may be helpful to improve the rate of success and minimise complications.
