Is Anterior-Only Fixation Adequate for Three-Column Injuries of the Cervical Spine?
- Author:
Siddharth Sekhar SETHY
1
;
Kaustubh AHUJA
;
Syed IFTHEKAR
;
Bhaskar SARKAR
;
Pankaj KANDWAL
Author Information
- Publication Type:Clinical Study
- From:Asian Spine Journal 2021;15(1):72-80
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Methods:Twenty-one patients undergoing ACDF/ACCF with a bone graft/metallic cage treatment for cervical injuries involving all three columns from January 2016 to July 2018 were included in the study. All of the patients were followed up monthly for the first 3 months and then every 6 months, until their last follow-up visit.
Results:Nineteen patients had AO type C injuries and were managed with ACDF, and two patients with AO type B injuries were managed with ACCF. Fifteen had a complete spinal cord injury, while six had an incomplete spinal cord injury (American Spinal Injury Association B, C, and D). The mean segmental kyphosis at presentation of 12.2°±4.4° improved in the postoperative period to -7.2°±2.5°. At their final follow-up, all the patients showed clinical improvements when assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (6.8–1.8), Oswestry Disability Index score (59.7–34.9), and Spinal Cord Independence Measure score (24.8–36.4). One patient in the ACDF group needed a secondary posterior fixation because of instability.
Conclusions:An anterior approach to the cervical spine in cervical fracture dislocations is an effective treatment showing an optimal recovery rate in terms of patient-reported outcomes and structural stability, with the added advantages of less blood loss and the fact that the technique requires less instrumentation.
