Investigation on Anti-liver Cancer Potential and Compatibility Characteristics of Fufang Biejia Ruangan Pian from Network Perspective
10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20202352
- VernacularTitle:从网络视角探讨复方鳖甲软肝片的抗肝癌潜能及其组方功效配伍特点
- Author:
Wen-jia CHEN
1
;
Xia MAO
1
;
Xiao-dong GUO
2
;
Ling-xiang YU
2
;
Na LIN
1
;
Yan-qiong ZHANG
1
Author Information
1. Institute of Chinese Materia Medica，China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences，Beijing 100700，China
2. The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital，Beijing 100039，China
- Publication Type:Research Article
- Keywords:
network pharmacology;
Fufang Biejia Ruangan Pian;
malignant transformation of inflammatory-carcinoma;
hepatocellular carcinoma;
theory of composing prescriptions;
clinical repositioning;
compatibility
- From:
Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae
2020;26(24):11-22
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the anti-liver cancer potential of Fufang Biejia Ruangan Pian （FBRP） and its compatibility characteristics from a network perspective， so as to provide a theoretical basis for the clinical repositioning of FBRP. Method:Three self-pairs of cancer and para-cancerous tissue samples were collected from three patients with primary liver cancer， and the whole genome expression profiling chip was used to detect the differential genes related to the development and progression of liver cancer. After collecting the phenotype-related genes and the candidate targets of the corresponding prescriptions of FBRP from The Encyclopedia of Traditional Chinese Medicine （ETCM） and Integrative Pharmacology-based Research Platform of Traditional Chinese Medicine （TCMIP） V2.0， the "differentially expressed genes related to liver cancer development-candidate targets of FBRP efficacy substance group" interaction network was constructed according to the interaction information between the above-mentioned differentially expressed genes related to liver cancer and the candidate targets of the FBRP efficacy group， and then the major network nodes were screened. After that， the enrichment analysis of the pathway was performed in order to explore the biological basis of various pharmacological efficacy groups of FBRP， including Xiaozheng Sanjie group （Trionycis Carapax and Curcumae Rhizoma）， Buxue Huoxue group （Paeoniae Radix Rubra， Angelicae Sinensis Radix and Notoginseng Radix et Rhizoma）， Yiqi Jianpi group （Codonopsis Radix and Astragali Radix）， Yuyin Yanggan group （Placenta Hominis and Cordyceps） and Qingre Jiedu group （Isatidis Radix and Forsythiae Fructus）. Result:The major network targets of the five efficacy groups may be involved into several common pathways but also associated with some special pathological processes. Those common pathways mainly contained the regulation of nervous system， the balance of immune-inflammatory system， the regulation of energy metabolism of various substances and cancer-related pathways， while the point was also reflected by the follows：①The regulating effects of Xiaozheng Sanjie group and Yiqi Jianpi group were summarized as promoting Qi circulation and relieving depression and replenishing Qi-blood， benefiting spirit. Buxue Huoxue group may also participate in the regulation of promoting Qi circulation and relieving depression and Yuyin Yanggan group may participate in the regulation of replenishing Qi-blood and benefiting spirit. ②The regulatory effects of the Xiaozheng Sanjie group and the Yuyin Yanggan group were summarized as essence， Qi and blood supplement. Buxue Huoxue group focused on the improvement of the immune-circulatory system. Qingre Jiedu group mainly regulated the balance of immune-inflammatory system by acting on T cell receptor signaling pathway. ③Yiqi Jianpi group was demonstrated to show the effects on various material and energy metabolisms. Yuyin Yanggan group exerted effects on lipid metabolism， carbohydrate metabolism， protein metabolism and hormone metabolism. Qingre Jiedu group was also involved into metabolism of nucleotide and hormone. ④In the aspect of alleviating the pathological changes of cancer， the regulatory effects of the five efficacy groups on cell cycle and other functions could be summarized as dispelling pathogenic factors. ⑤The whole prescription focused on the anti-liver cancer potential of FBRP as a whole， while each efficacy group emphasized that each efficacy group had its own functional characteristics. The two network analysis models complemented and verified each other. Conclusion:FBRP has the anti-hepatoma potential. By revealing the biological connotation of its efficacy and the rationality of the compatibility， the regulation mechanism of FBRP to correct the imbalance network of inflammation and cancer in liver is clarified， which can provide the possibility and biological basis for FBRP to increase the clinical indications for the prevention and treatment of liver cancer.
