Effects of intravenous-inhalational anesthesia and intravenous anesthesia on implicit, explicit memory and stress response in patients undergoing gynecological tumor surgery
10.3760/cma.j.cn115355-20190814-00361
- VernacularTitle:静吸复合麻醉与静脉麻醉对妇科肿瘤手术患者内隐记忆、外显记忆及应激反应的影响
- Author:
Guojie HAN
1
;
Xiaoyu WANG
;
Taotao XING
;
Xiaoli AN
;
Yi LIU
Author Information
1. 山西医科大学麻醉学系，太原 030001
- From:
Cancer Research and Clinic
2020;32(9):628-632
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effects of propofol combined with sevoflurane intravenous-inhalational anesthesia and propofol intravenous anesthesia on implicit memory, explicit memory and stress response in patients undergoing gynecological cancer surgery.Methods:A total of 48 patients undergoing gynecologic cancer surgery in the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from August 2018 to May 2019 were selected. Random number table was used to divide patients into propofol intravenous anesthesia group (group A) and propofol combined with sevoflurane intravenous-inhalational anesthesia group (group B), 24 cases in each group. During the operation, the patients in group A were given continuous intravenous anesthesia with propofol and the patients in group B were given continuous intravenous anesthesia with propofol combined with sevoflurane. Minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane was 0.5, and midazolam was not utilized throughout the whole anesthesia for both groups. The bispectral index (BIS) value of the two groups ranged from 45 to 55 during the operation. The concentration of cortisol, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and prolactin(PRL) in elbow venous blood was measured before anesthesia induction (T 1) and 10 minutes after intraoperative auditory recording (T 2). Implicit and explicit memory scores were measured 12-24 h after operation. Results:Neither group produced explicit memory compared with 0 (group A: 0.012±0.007, t = 1.554, P > 0.05; group B: 0.016±0.002, t = 1.942, P > 0.05), and there was no significant difference in explicit memory score between the two groups ( t = -0.417, P > 0.05). Both groups produced implicit memory (group A: 0.089±0.050, t = 8.726, P < 0.05; group B: 0.189±0.060, t = 15.415, P < 0.05), and implicit memory score was higher in group B ( t = -6.215, P < 0.05). The level of cortisol, ACTH and PRL at time T 1 was not significantly different between the two groups (all P > 0.05), and the level of cortisol, ACTH and PRL in group B was higher than that in group A at time T 2 [(276±35) μg/L vs. (96±33) μg/L; (228±42.3) pg/ml vs. (14.1±1.7) pg/ml; (4 208±213) mU/ml vs. (3 805±196) mU/ml; t value was 18.634, 34.879, 12.605, all P < 0.05]. Conclusion:Propofol intravenous anesthesia can better inhibit the production of implicit memory and intraoperative stress response compared with propofol combined with sevoflurane intravenous-inhalational anesthesia.
