Preliminary exploration and practice of clinical research assessment system based on a tertiary hospital
10.3760/cma.j.cn113565-20190530-00100
- VernacularTitle:某三甲医院临床研究考核评估体系的初探与实践
- Author:
Wei ZHANG
1
;
Yaosheng WANG
;
Guangyu CHEN
;
Xi ZHANG
;
Fei ZHONG
;
Zhongmin ZHENG
;
Kun SUN
;
Xin ZHOU
Author Information
1. 上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院临床研究中心 200092
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management
2020;33(3):227-231
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To construct assessment and evaluation system of clinical research and its application in practice. To explore the reliability, validity and discrimination of this index system, and evaluate its effect.Methods:The cluster was randomly sampled from 54 clinical departments. Taking the department as units, all individuals in each department was conducted a questionnaire survey for empirical analysis. Cronbach's coefficient and factor analysis were used to verify the reliability and validity of the index system. The correlation coefficient method was used to analyze the discrimination. The t-test method was used to calculate the discrimination. Extreme grouping method was used to compare the difference between high grouping and low grouping to validate the difference of each index.Results:Cronbach′s α of the whole index system is 0.840. Through exploratory factor analysis, four common factors were extracted, and the cumulative contribution rate is 56.278%. Through correlation coefficient method and t-test method, results show that except for the " concluding situation" , " number of visitors to clinical scientists workstation" and " personnel selected into talent category clinical research program" , the differences of other indicators were statistically significant ( P<0.05), and the distinguish index was between 0.31 and 0.64. Conclusions:The clinical research assessment system has good reliability and validity. And the discrimination is good. The index system can accurately assess the clinical research situation. It can be used for reference in assessment of clinical efficiency.
