Establishment and application of clinical discipline evaluation index system in cancer hospital based on Delphi method
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-1924.2020.02.004
- VernacularTitle:基于德尔菲法的肿瘤医院临床医学学科评估指标体系的构建与应用
- Author:
Xuedong YAN
1
;
Dan WANG
;
Shuqin JIA
Author Information
1. 北京大学肿瘤医院暨北京市肿瘤防治研究所科研处 100142
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management
2020;33(2):96-101
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To establish a scientific, directional and operable evaluation index system for clinical disciplines, which can meet the needs of discipline construction and is suitable for the evaluation and selection of various disciplines in oncology hospitals, so as to provide decision-making basis for discipline construction.Methods:Literature analysis and in-depth interview were used to draw up the preliminary evaluation index system. The index frame of subject evaluation was compiled, and the expert inquiry paper was compiled, and the index was added, subtracted and modified by Delphi method through two rounds of expert consultation. The index weight was determined by Analytic hierarchy process. Each index was given a specific scoring standard. The evaluation index system was used to test and analyze 22 clinical medical disciplines in the hospital. The total score of each discipline was calculated by weighted summation method. The validity of evaluation was judged by Spearman grade correlation analysis.Results:The clinical discipline evaluation index system consisted of 4 first-class indexes, 10 second-class indexes and 34 third-class indexes. The weights and scoring criteria of each index were determined. 22 disciplines were evaluated by the index system, which was divided into three grades: excellent, medium and poor.Conclusions:The evaluation index system of clinical discipline constructed in this study has high authoritative coefficient of experts, and the P value is less than 0.01.The evaluation results of 22 disciplines are highly correlated with those of experts, and the P value is less than 0.01. It has strong scientific validity and feasibility, and lays a foundation for the widespread application of clinical evaluation.
