Effect of Sun’s procedure on acute Stanford type A aortic dissection in patients over 60 years old compared with debranching hybrid procedure
10.3760/cma.j.cn112434-20190906-00305
- VernacularTitle:孙氏手术与去分支杂交手术治疗60岁以上急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层患者效果比较
- Author:
Bochen YAO
1
;
Xiaozhong MA
;
Tongyun CHEN
;
Meng WANG
;
Nan JIANG
;
Qingliang CHEN
Author Information
1. 天津医科大学研究生院 300070
- From:
Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
2020;36(8):481-485
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of Sun's procedure and debranching hybrid procedure in the treatment of elderly acute Stanford type A aortic dissection.Methods:53 elderly patients(aged over 60 years old) with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection admitted to Tianjin Chest hospital from January 2017 to June 2018 were selected and divided into Sun's procedure group of 35 patients and debranching hybrid procedure group of 18 patients. The history of cerebral infarction before operation was more in the hybridization operation group than in the Sun's operation group, and the difference of other preoperative data was not statistically significant. The brain protection strategy was adopted in both groups. During Sun's procedure, bilateral anterograde cerebral perfusion and descending aorta balloon occlusion were performed to maintain the blood supply of lower limbs.And the total aortic arch and branch blood vessels were closed by stent-graft in debranching hybrid procedure.The basic data and perioperative conditions of the patients were statistically analyzed, and the postoperative results and short-term prognosis were compared between the two groups after 1 year of follow-up.Results:The hybrid group avoided circulatory arrest, and the lowest intraoperative nasopharyngeal temperature was slightly higher than that of the Sun' s group[(25.1±0.4)℃ ratio(27.7±0.6)℃)]. However, there were no significant difference in the operation time[(178.9±43.5)min ratio(166.9±95.4)min] and intraoperative blood loss[(1 724.9±1 394.2)ml ratio(1 590.7±920.5)ml] between the two groups, and no significant difference in postoperative renal failure(20% ratio 11.1%), cerebrovascular accident(cerebral infarction/cerebral hemorrhage)(11.4% ratio 5.6%), cognitive dysfunction(17.1% ratio 11.1%), ventilator assistance time[84.0(25.0, 160.0) hours ratio 61.7(17.3, 90.5) hours], ICU stay time[6.5(2.9, 14.3) days ratio 4.4(2.0, 6.1) days] and so on. There were 3 perioperative deaths in Sun's group and 2 perioperative deaths in hybrid group.The mean follow-up time of the two groups was 14.8 months. During the follow-up period of Sun's group, no new cerebrovascular event and 1 case of distal false lumen of the descending thoracic aorta active blood flow occurred and 1 case died 2 months after the operation.There was 1 case of new cerebrovascular events in hybrid group and no death. The 1-year survival rate was similar between the two groups.Conclusion:For patients over 60 years old with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection, Sun's procedure and hybrid procedure are safe and effective.
